Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
edited by
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Biocultural paradigm • Common good • Life-long learning methods • Representation • Contemporary conflicts • Endangered heritage • Migrants’ rights • Humanitarian law • Memory • Cultural rights • Study circle • Ecosystems research • Subject-object • Appropriation • Unesco • Slovenia • Dialogue • Representations • ICH • Dalmatia • Property • Right to take part in cultural life • Mexico • Human rights • Street performances • Venice • Local CH • Vernacular architecture • Cultural property • Mining • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Knowledge • Sephardic Jews • Social justice • Museums • Stigmatization • Digital culture • Italian Colonialism • Cultural goods • Cultural • Dance • Romani People • Right to the (I)CH • Digital heritage • Responsibility to protect • Right to participate in cultural life • Legal and Social Anthropology • Hydrography • Ownership • Cultural sustainability • Sharing and integration • Terrorism • Tintoretto • Venetian craftsmanship • Mediterranean • Management and governance • Heritage Community • Urban sprawl • Religious heritage • Heritage community • Communities • Animal Rights Movements • Heritage walk • Agreement • Ruskin • NGOs • Indigenous people • Cultural heritage • Guardians • Gender • Landscape • Social memory • Politics of place • Return • Guilt • Intentional destruction • Active Citizenship • Destruction • Digital repatriation • Restitution • Bona fide purchaser • Exclusion • International law • Participative approach • Ethnography • Fascism • Ecomuseums • Working tools • Local communities • Digital • Faro Convention • Tourism • Folklore • Commons • Regional law • Traditional Knowledge • Gondola’s heritagisation • Access • Cultural identity • Intangible • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Stakeholders • Local collective action • Certificate of free circulation • Adult education • Chorus • International art market • CH • Heritage practices • Cultural interest • Governance • Heritage politics • Heritage • Europe • Cultural communities • Cultural properties • Waterscapes • Participation
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4