Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
a cura di
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Human rights • Sephardic Jews • Heritage practices • Cultural identity • Working tools • Urban sprawl • Access • Appropriation • Knowledge • Return • Venetian craftsmanship • Responsibility to protect • Heritage Community • ICH • Property • Tintoretto • Heritage community • Legal and Social Anthropology • International law • Street performances • Cultural rights • Restitution • Sharing and integration • Active Citizenship • Tourism • Animal Rights Movements • Mexico • Cultural communities • Destruction • Dalmatia • Mediterranean • Digital culture • Local CH • Representation • Dialogue • Slovenia • Landscape • Digital heritage • Humanitarian law • Dance • Cultural goods • Traditional Knowledge • Heritage politics • Intentional destruction • Stakeholders • Local communities • Politics of place • Terrorism • Agreement • Faro Convention • Cultural properties • CH • Gondola’s heritagisation • Digital • Memory • Heritage • Digital repatriation • Guardians • Management and governance • Bona fide purchaser • Cultural • Cultural interest • Ethnography • Chorus • Right to participate in cultural life • Unesco • Certificate of free circulation • Representations • Participative approach • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Folklore • Cultural property • Right to the (I)CH • Local collective action • Indigenous people • Subject-object • Common good • Intangible • Communities • Ownership • Europe • NGOs • Ruskin • Fascism • Right to take part in cultural life • Ecomuseums • Migrants’ rights • Italian Colonialism • Guilt • Commons • Social memory • Waterscapes • Religious heritage • Regional law • Biocultural paradigm • International art market • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Romani People • Cultural sustainability • Social justice • Contemporary conflicts • Venice • Endangered heritage • Exclusion • Gender • Governance • Heritage walk • Life-long learning methods • Participation • Stigmatization • Study circle • Museums • Cultural heritage • Ecosystems research • Hydrography • Vernacular architecture • Adult education • Mining
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4