Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
a cura di
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Local collective action • Gender • Active Citizenship • Dialogue • Agreement • Intentional destruction • Museums • Street performances • Regional law • Urban sprawl • Intangible • Indigenous people • Humanitarian law • Access • Appropriation • Tintoretto • Tourism • Hydrography • Cultural communities • Participative approach • Cultural interest • Knowledge • Heritage community • Cultural identity • Folklore • Communities • Participation • Landscape • Stigmatization • Stakeholders • Unesco • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Heritage • Guardians • Study circle • Legal and Social Anthropology • Venice • Dance • Commons • Destruction • Cultural • Mining • Local communities • Cultural heritage • Fascism • ICH • Return • Certificate of free circulation • Digital culture • Migrants’ rights • Right to take part in cultural life • Working tools • Cultural rights • Governance • Traditional Knowledge • Digital heritage • Europe • Faro Convention • Animal Rights Movements • Ownership • Chorus • International art market • Adult education • Human rights • Politics of place • Ecosystems research • Right to the (I)CH • Italian Colonialism • Cultural property • Slovenia • Venetian craftsmanship • Ruskin • Vernacular architecture • Heritage practices • Heritage Community • NGOs • Local CH • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Guilt • Memory • Sharing and integration • Subject-object • Social memory • Bona fide purchaser • Heritage walk • Management and governance • Representations • Endangered heritage • Digital • Right to participate in cultural life • Cultural sustainability • Waterscapes • Biocultural paradigm • Dalmatia • Romani People • Social justice • Ecomuseums • Common good • Responsibility to protect • Cultural properties • Life-long learning methods • Terrorism • CH • Heritage politics • Digital repatriation • Mediterranean • Ethnography • Cultural goods • Sephardic Jews • Exclusion • Contemporary conflicts • Mexico • Gondola’s heritagisation • Representation • Restitution • Religious heritage • Property • International law
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4