Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
a cura di
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Landscape • Legal and Social Anthropology • Property • Politics of place • Ecosystems research • Vernacular architecture • Tintoretto • Digital • Certificate of free circulation • International art market • Heritage • CH • Contemporary conflicts • Representation • Hydrography • Biocultural paradigm • Local collective action • Heritage walk • Terrorism • Digital heritage • Europe • Right to participate in cultural life • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Responsibility to protect • Digital culture • Dalmatia • Digital repatriation • Common good • Intangible • Exclusion • Social memory • Traditional Knowledge • Sephardic Jews • Cultural sustainability • Working tools • Representations • Ruskin • Cultural rights • Italian Colonialism • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Romani People • NGOs • Return • Street performances • Cultural communities • Memory • Management and governance • Appropriation • Regional law • Sharing and integration • Active Citizenship • Guilt • Animal Rights Movements • Participation • Restitution • Indigenous people • Gender • Life-long learning methods • Right to the (I)CH • Destruction • Venetian craftsmanship • Cultural goods • Mediterranean • Heritage practices • Cultural heritage • Cultural identity • Commons • Bona fide purchaser • Slovenia • Dialogue • Gondola’s heritagisation • Agreement • Local communities • Participative approach • Cultural properties • Subject-object • Urban sprawl • Waterscapes • Heritage community • Ethnography • Venice • Adult education • Heritage Community • Knowledge • Cultural property • Human rights • Intentional destruction • Stakeholders • Cultural interest • Mining • Tourism • International law • Ownership • Faro Convention • Museums • Endangered heritage • Folklore • Right to take part in cultural life • Dance • Migrants’ rights • Chorus • Communities • Social justice • Heritage politics • Ecomuseums • Fascism • ICH • Mexico • Study circle • Humanitarian law • Stigmatization • Cultural • Guardians • Local CH • Access • Religious heritage • Unesco • Governance
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4