Space Oddity: Exercises in Art and Philosophy
open access-
a cura di
- Giulia Gelmi - Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia - email
- Anastasia Kozachenko-Stravinsky - Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia - email
- Andrea Nalesso - Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia - email
Abstract
The volume includes papers presented at the 4th Postgraduate International Conference of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Venice, 5-7 October 2022). Our understanding of reality is filtered through myriad media, and we have the ability – and power – to gather, ignore, tweak, and explore the information needed to define what we mean by ‘reality’. The concept of ‘space’ – in its broadest sense – plays an essential role in an individual’s explanation of reality, and we must deal with a plurality of models and concepts of it. As elaborated in the text Space and Time in Art, the Russian theologian, philosopher, and art theorist Pavel Florensky states: “all culture can be interpreted as the activity of organising space”. Starting from this culturological reading, Florensky identifies three spatial “dimensions” and three corresponding genres of activity: (1) The space of our strong relations and the activity of ‘Technique’; (2) The mental space and its organisation and the activities of ‘Science’ or ‘Philosophy’; (3) The space between the previous two, and the activity of ‘Art’. Ultimately, all have the same aim: to change reality to reconstruct space. According to leading scholars and critics, the late 1980s saw a “spatial turn” take place in literary, social, and cultural studies. In 1991 Fredric Jameson theorised a shift from the paradigm of time to the paradigm of space, from modernism to postmodernism. The pandemic era has refocused investigation on the present paradigm, where Florensky’s spaces have been concentrated through cyberspace almost overnight. Through the notion of the ‘semiosphere’ – as elaborated by Juri Lotman 100 years ago – we collectively pondered the question: “should we reconsider the concept of space as a cultural category altogether?”.
Keywords Organism • Mies van der Rohe • Home • Visual identity • Kommunalka • Architecture • Arts and crafts • Landscape • Ephemeral architecture • Malafouris • Conspicuous • Transición • Visibility • Nefs • Coloniality • Ephemera • Ancient Stoicism • Power • Early Modern Age • Musical repatriation • Blind man’s stick • Krzysztof Wodiczko • Philosophy • Architecture curation • Drawing • Visual culture • Transparency • Skill • Image Theory • Incorporeals • Chile • Sound and audiovisual archives • Altar • Isa Genzken • Louis Marin • Art history • Bird’s-eye View • Curatorial theory • Biennial Art • History of art • Eline Mugaas • Historiography • Hypercomfort • Dwelling • Presence • Heidegger • Field • Technology • Elise Storsveen • Architecture exhibition • The Tupikov House • Hauntology • Visual studies • Conflagration • Room • Orbit • Folklore • Martha Rosler • Fyodor Stravinsky • Ethnomusicology • Crucifixion • Dance • Analogue photography • Artist • Material culture • Performance installation • Void • Knapping • Archival turn • Public space • National image • Opacity • Visual semiotics • Place • Audience • Space • Ship models • Body • John of the Cross • Communal apartments • Cultural decolonialism • Art • National Pavilion • Igor Stravinsky • Photography • Digital archives • Modernity • Exhibition theory • Absence • Hudinilson Jr • Architectural design • Inflatables • Non-human • Topology • Archival spaces • Cultural discourse • Kustar • Stravinsky’s family • Russian style • Consumption • Scrapbook • Scrapbooking • Ritual • Cultural space • Museum • Enunciation • Architecture representations • Venice Biennale • Late Middle Ages • Ontology • Displaying
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-675-6 | e-ISBN 978-88-6969-675-6 | Pubblicato 21 Dicembre 2022 | Lingua en
Copyright © 2022 Giulia Gelmi, Anastasia Kozachenko-Stravinsky, Andrea Nalesso. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
- Introduction
- 21 Dicembre 2022
Display Tools: From Theory to Practice
- The Question of Space in the Chilean Representation and Pavilion in Venice Biennale
- 21 Dicembre 2022
Juggling the Presence, Revealing the Concepts
- The ‘Odd’ Conception of Space in Stoic Philosophy
- 21 Dicembre 2022
- Making Room: Heidegger’s Concept of Einräumung
- 21 Dicembre 2022
-
The Controversial Rise of Skilled Intentionality
Reconsidering Hylonoetic Agency in Malafouris’ Material Engagement Theory - 21 Dicembre 2022
Cultural Crossroads: In Search of a Common Ground
-
The Stravinsky’s Family. The Home as a Strategy of Life and Creation
Apartment on the Kryukov Canal: From an Apartment House to a Communal Apartment - 21 Dicembre 2022
Social Dynamics’ Insight: Questioning Power and Community
- Nefs d’Or, Nefs d’Argent Between Space and Power
- 21 Dicembre 2022
Permeable Boundaries: Materiality vs Immateriality
-
The Space of the Body from Classical to Contemporary Dance
A Matter of Coloniality - 21 Dicembre 2022
- Performance Installation as a Haunted Landscape
- 21 Dicembre 2022
- Vital Spaces and Living Spaces in Contemporary Archival Practice
- 21 Dicembre 2022
Representation as Trace of Enunciation
-
From Inside to Outside and Vice Versa
A Contribution on Spatiality in Analogue Photography - 21 Dicembre 2022
-
Topology of Scrapbooking
Browsing Through a Space in Constant Transformation - 21 Dicembre 2022
-
Orbital Dying
Watching the Crucifixion from God’s Point of View - 21 Dicembre 2022
Building Narratives, Imagining Realities
-
Constructing the National Image
Identity and Material Culture in Late Imperial Russia Public Museum Practices - 21 Dicembre 2022