Series |
Quaderni di Venezia Arti
Volume 6 | Edited book | Space Oddity: Exercises in Art and Philosophy
Abstract
The volume includes papers presented at the 4th Postgraduate International Conference of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Venice, 5-7 October 2022). Our understanding of reality is filtered through myriad media, and we have the ability – and power – to gather, ignore, tweak, and explore the information needed to define what we mean by ‘reality’. The concept of ‘space’ – in its broadest sense – plays an essential role in an individual’s explanation of reality, and we must deal with a plurality of models and concepts of it. As elaborated in the text Space and Time in Art, the Russian theologian, philosopher, and art theorist Pavel Florensky states: “all culture can be interpreted as the activity of organising space”. Starting from this culturological reading, Florensky identifies three spatial “dimensions” and three corresponding genres of activity: (1) The space of our strong relations and the activity of ‘Technique’; (2) The mental space and its organisation and the activities of ‘Science’ or ‘Philosophy’; (3) The space between the previous two, and the activity of ‘Art’. Ultimately, all have the same aim: to change reality to reconstruct space. According to leading scholars and critics, the late 1980s saw a “spatial turn” take place in literary, social, and cultural studies. In 1991 Fredric Jameson theorised a shift from the paradigm of time to the paradigm of space, from modernism to postmodernism. The pandemic era has refocused investigation on the present paradigm, where Florensky’s spaces have been concentrated through cyberspace almost overnight. Through the notion of the ‘semiosphere’ – as elaborated by Juri Lotman 100 years ago – we collectively pondered the question: “should we reconsider the concept of space as a cultural category altogether?”.
Keywords Philosophy • Russian style • Consumption • Cultural space • Drawing • Bird’s-eye View • Dance • Topology • Orbit • Body • Cultural discourse • Igor Stravinsky • Conspicuous • Mies van der Rohe • Transparency • Photography • Chile • Power • Absence • Venice Biennale • Void • Field • Presence • Dwelling • Exhibition theory • Ephemeral architecture • Ship models • Visibility • Architecture • Enunciation • Public space • Image Theory • Visual identity • Analogue photography • Early Modern Age • Curatorial theory • Musical repatriation • Martha Rosler • Architecture representations • Nefs • Altar • Ancient Stoicism • Knapping • Digital archives • Visual semiotics • Scrapbook • Skill • John of the Cross • Transición • Elise Storsveen • Art history • Art • Technology • Louis Marin • Late Middle Ages • Kustar • Ephemera • Room • Hauntology • Biennial Art • Fyodor Stravinsky • Ritual • Coloniality • Architecture curation • Crucifixion • Architectural design • Inflatables • Audience • Cultural decolonialism • Kommunalka • Historiography • Artist • Krzysztof Wodiczko • Museum • Malafouris • Hudinilson Jr • National Pavilion • Incorporeals • Arts and crafts • Stravinsky’s family • The Tupikov House • Architecture exhibition • Visual studies • National image • Visual culture • Scrapbooking • Conflagration • Archival turn • Space • Home • Ethnomusicology • Non-human • Blind man’s stick • Eline Mugaas • Modernity • Heidegger • Opacity • Sound and audiovisual archives • History of art • Folklore • Hypercomfort • Displaying • Performance installation • Place • Communal apartments • Organism • Archival spaces • Ontology • Landscape • Material culture • Isa Genzken
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-675-6 | e-ISBN 978-88-6969-675-6 | Published Dec. 21, 2022 | Language en
Copyright © 2022 Giulia Gelmi, Anastasia Kozachenko-Stravinsky, Andrea Nalesso. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.