Collana |
Antichistica
Miscellanea | Altera pars laboris
Capitolo | Certissimo argumento aeternitati plus conferre tenuissimas membranas quam praedura marmora
Certissimo argumento aeternitati plus conferre tenuissimas membranas quam praedura marmora
De la plausibilité de quelques restitutions
- Pierre Laurens - Université Paris-Sorbonne, France - email
Abstract
The Aureolus inscription is a text transmitted by the Vita Triginta tyrannorum as an awkward translation made by a grammarian. It has been unanimously regarded as a forgery, created by Trebellius Pollio. The inscription is quoted in his Rerum patriae by Andrea Alciato, who translates it again in a first draft of his Antiquitates Mediolanenses, before giving his own translation in the Dresdensis manuscript, from which it goes one’s own way until being denounced as a forgery by Mommsen. Is it a double forgery? One will find here some evidence in favour of the rehabilitation of the testimony of the Historia Augusta.
Presentato: 14 Luglio 2019 | Accettato: 18 Ottobre 2019 | Pubblicato 11 Dicembre 2019 | Lingua: fr
Keywords Andrea Alciato • Aureolus • Trebellius Pollio • Epigraphic forgery • Authenticity
Copyright © 2019 Pierre Laurens. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-374-8/009
- La parte più difficile del mestiere di epigrafista
- Alfredo Buonopane, Lorenzo Calvelli, Giovannella Cresci Marrone
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Il Museo Nani in un manoscritto di Aurelio Guarnieri Ottoni
- Simona Antolini
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- L’apport du Lugdunum priscum de Claude Bellièvre à la connaissance de l’épigraphie lyonnaise
- François Bérard
- 11 Dicembre 2019
-
‘Dans les pierres, il ne peut y avoir de fiction’ ?
Authentiques, faux et pastiches dans l’œuvre érudite et poétique de l’humaniste sévillan Rodrigo Caro (1573-1647) - Roland Béhar, Gwladys Bernard
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Bibliotheca epigraphica manuscripta: dal 1881 a oggi
- Marco Buonocore
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- L’orientaliste Antoine Galland et la découverte des inscriptions de la cité des Viducasses en Normandie
- Elisabeth Deniaux
- 11 Dicembre 2019
-
Le iscrizioni dell’album del Louvre di Jacopo Bellini
Una fonte attendibile per epigrafia e iconografia? - Donato Fasolini
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- La tradizione manoscritta delle epigrafi latine di Tarentum
- Annarosa Gallo
- 11 Dicembre 2019
-
Certissimo argumento aeternitati plus conferre tenuissimas membranas quam praedura marmora
De la plausibilité de quelques restitutions - Pierre Laurens
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Les inscriptions relatives à Vaison-la-Romaine (Vaucluse, France) à la lumière de Joseph-Dominique Fabre de Saint-Véran
- Nicolas Mathieu
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Tradizione giurisprudenziale manoscritta dei Digesta e tabulae ceratae da Londinium: TLond. 55 e 57
- Fara Nasti
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Una nuova dedica a Ercole da un manoscritto di Bonifacius Amerbach
- Silvia Orlandi
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Da Vid a Venezia: due reperti antichi tra collezionismo ed interessi eruditi nel sec. XVIII
- Gianfranco Paci
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- Fortune de l’inscription du temple d’Isis des manuscrits épigraphiques du Quattrocento aux Antiquités de la Ville d’Andrea Fulvio (1527)
- Anne Raffarin
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- L’apport des manuscrits de Joseph-Marie de Suarès (1599-1677) à l’élaboration du Corpus des inscriptions latines de Vaison-la-Romaine et de son territoire
- Bernard Rémy
- 11 Dicembre 2019
-
Épigraphie en révolution
La visite du Père Dumont à Vaison (1790) - Benoît Rossignol
- 11 Dicembre 2019
- L’Abate Galiani epigrafista
- Umberto Soldovieri
- 11 Dicembre 2019
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:j.0="http://purl.org/...
<http://id.crossref.org/issn/2610-8828>
a <http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/Journal> ;
...
{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2020,6,10]],"date-time":"2020-06-10T02:33:47Z","timestamp":1591756427809}...
TY - GENERIC
DO - 10.30687/978-88-6969-374-8/009
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-374-...
@incollection{Laurens_2019,
doi = {10.30687/978-88-6969-374-8/009},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3068...
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<doi_records>
<doi_record owner="10.30687" timestamp="2020...
Laurens, Pierre. ‘Certissimo Argumento Aeternitati Plus Conferre Tenuissimas Membranas Quam Praedura...
Laurens, Pierre. ‘Certissimo Argumento Aeternitati Plus Conferre Tenuissimas Membranas Quam Praedura...
DC Field | Value |
---|---|
dc.identifier |
ECF_chapter_3408 |
dc.contributor.author |
Laurens Pierre |
dc.title |
Certissimo argumento aeternitati plus conferre tenuissimas membranas quam praedura marmora. De la plausibilité de quelques restitutions |
dc.type |
Capitolo |
dc.language.iso |
fr |
dc.description.abstract |
The Aureolus inscription is a text transmitted by the Vita Triginta tyrannorum as an awkward translation made by a grammarian. It has been unanimously regarded as a forgery, created by Trebellius Pollio. The inscription is quoted in his Rerum patriae by Andrea Alciato, who translates it again in a first draft of his Antiquitates Mediolanenses, before giving his own translation in the Dresdensis manuscript, from which it goes one’s own way until being denounced as a forgery by Mommsen. Is it a double forgery? One will find here some evidence in favour of the rehabilitation of the testimony of the Historia Augusta. |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Antichistica |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Storia ed epigrafia |
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing |
dc.issued |
2019-12-11 |
dc.dateAccepted |
2019-10-18 |
dc.dateSubmitted |
2019-07-14 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-375-5/certissimo-argumento-aeternitati-plus-conferre-ten/ |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.30687/978-88-6969-374-8/009 |
dc.identifier.issn |
2610-8828 |
dc.identifier.eissn |
2610-9344 |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-88-6969-375-5 |
dc.identifier.eisbn |
978-88-6969-374-8 |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
item.fulltext |
with fulltext |
item.grantfulltext |
open |
dc.peer-review |
yes |
dc.subject |
Andrea Alciato |
dc.subject |
Andrea Alciato |
dc.subject |
Aureolus |
dc.subject |
Aureolus |
dc.subject |
Authenticity |
dc.subject |
Authenticity |
dc.subject |
Epigraphic forgery |
dc.subject |
Epigraphic forgery |
dc.subject |
Trebellius Pollio |
dc.subject |
Trebellius Pollio |
Download data |