Series | Sinica venetiana
Edited book | Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics
Chapter | The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals

The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals

Exploring the Distribution Via Corpus-Based Approach

Abstract

This paper is intended to test the deontic vs anankastic hypothesis outlined by Sparvoli 2012. The stipulation is that, in past contexts, deontic modals trigger a counterfactual inference, while anankastic modals (here called ‘goal-oriented modals’) either trigger an actuality entailment effects (‘only possibility’ modals) or a generic non-factual reading (‘mere necessity’ modals). The result of this corpus-based study conducted in a Chinese-English parallel corpus confirm the crucial role played by the deontic vs goal-oriented contrast in the marking of factuality in Chinese and shows that the factuality value decreases across a cline from goal-oriented to deontic modals.


Open access | Peer reviewed

Submitted: March 4, 2020 | Accepted: Oct. 14, 2020 | Language: en

Keywords Actuality entailmentDeontic modalityGoal-oriented modalityCounterfactuality


read this chapter


Se trovi interessanti le nostre pubblicazioni e vuoi ricevere aggiornamenti sulle prossime uscite, iscriviti ora alla nostra newsletter.

x

Newsletter