Home > General catalogue > Sinica venetiana > Corpus-Based Research on Chinese Language and Linguistics > The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals
cover

The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals

Exploring the Distribution Via Corpus-Based Approach

Carlotta Sparvoli    Alma Mater Studiorum, Università di Bologna, Italia    

PDF

abstract

This paper is intended to test the deontic vs anankastic hypothesis outlined by Sparvoli 2012. The stipulation is that, in past contexts, deontic modals trigger a counterfactual inference, while anankastic modals (here called ‘goal-oriented modals’) either trigger an actuality entailment effects (‘only possibility’ modals) or a generic non-factual reading (‘mere necessity’ modals). The result of this corpus-based study conducted in a Chinese-English parallel corpus confirm the crucial role played by the deontic vs goal-oriented contrast in the marking of factuality in Chinese and shows that the factuality value decreases across a cline from goal-oriented to deontic modals.

Submitted
March 4, 2020
Accepted
Oct. 14, 2020
Language
EN
ISBN (PRINT)
978-88-6969-407-3
ISBN (EBOOK)
978-88-6969-406-6