Perceiving Images and Styles

« articolo precedente | articolo successivo »

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_article_5002
dc.title	Perceiving Images and Styles
dc.contributor.author	Gavaler Chris
dc.contributor.author	Goldberg Nathaniel
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type	Articolo
dc.language.iso	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/riviste/the-journal-for-the-philosophy-of-language-mind-an/2021/1/perceiving-images-and-styles/
dc.description.abstract	Marks individually or in combination constitute images that represent objects. How do those images represent those objects? Marks vary in style, both between and within images. Images also vary in style. How do those styles relate to each other and to the objects that those images represent? Referencing a diverse range of images, we answer the first question with a response-dependence theory of image representation derived from Mark Johnston, differentiating Lockean primary qualities of marks from secondary qualities of images. We answer the second question with a perceptual theory of style derived from Paul Grice, differentiating physical style from image style, and representing conventionally from representing conversationally.
dc.relation.ispartof	JoLMA
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 2 \| Num. 1 \| Giugno 2021
dc.issued	2021-06-30
dc.dateSubmitted	2021-02-11
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2723-9640
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/008
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Image
dc.subject	Image
dc.subject	Implicature
dc.subject	Implicature
dc.subject	Representation
dc.subject	Representation
dc.subject	Response-dependence
dc.subject	Response-dependence
dc.subject	Style
dc.subject	Style

Articolo
open access peer reviewed

Nathaniel Goldberg Washington and Lee University, USA

Chris Gavaler Washington and Lee University, USA

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Marks individually or in combination constitute images that represent objects. How do those images represent those objects? Marks vary in style, both between and within images. Images also vary in style. How do those styles relate to each other and to the objects that those images represent? Referencing a diverse range of images, we answer the first question with a response-dependence theory of image representation derived from Mark Johnston, differentiating Lockean primary qualities of marks from secondary qualities of images. We answer the second question with a perceptual theory of style derived from Paul Grice, differentiating physical style from image style, and representing conventionally from representing conversationally.

Pubblicato

30 Giugno 2021

Presentato

11 Febbraio 2021

Lingua

Keywords: Representation • Image • Style • Response-dependence • Implicature

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2021/01/008

Copyright: © 2021 Nathaniel Goldberg, Chris Gavaler. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite