An haeresis sit crimen. Leibniz contro Thomasius?

Home > Catalogo > Philosophica > Le ragioni degli altri > An haeresis sit crimen. Leibniz contro Thomasius?

Philosophica | Volume 3

Le ragioni degli altri

home collana info collana | home volume

« capitolo precedente | capitolo successivo »

cover

cover

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_625
dc.contributor.author	Priarolo Mariangela
dc.title	An haeresis sit crimen. Leibniz contro Thomasius?
dc.type	Capitolo
dc.language.iso	it
dc.description.abstract	Since the end of the Enlightenment, Christian Thomasius (1655-1728) was seen as a hero of religious freedom and a champion of toleration. A similar portrait was caused by Thomasius’ important writings against sorcery, torture and heresy. Among them, the dissertation An haeresis sit crimen (1697) is noteworthy, also because it was criticized by Leibniz, who seems to think that heresy must be prosecuted. Does that mean that, contrarily to Thomasius, Leibniz held a conservative or even a reactionary position and supported intolerance? In the following, I will dwell upon this question, trying to show that Leibniz’ critics of Thomasius shall not be read as a refusal of religious toleration, but, on the contrary, as a different way – in a certain sense more effective – to support it.
dc.relation.ispartof	Philosophica
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing
dc.issued	2017-04-12
dc.dateSubmitted	2016-12-14
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-133-1/an-haeresis-sit-crimen-leibniz-contro-thomasius/
dc.identifier.doi	10.14277/6969-132-4/PHIL-3-6
dc.identifier.issn	2610-8933
dc.identifier.eissn	2610-8925
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-133-1
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-132-4
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	no
dc.subject	Absolutism
dc.subject	Absolutism
dc.subject	Christian Thomasius
dc.subject	Christian Thomasius
dc.subject	Heresy
dc.subject	Heresy
dc.subject	Leibniz
dc.subject	Leibniz
dc.subject	Toleration
dc.subject	Toleration

Capitolo
open access

An haeresis sit crimen. Leibniz contro Thomasius?

Mariangela Priarolo Istituto d’Istruzione Superiore «E. Santoni», Pisa, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Since the end of the Enlightenment, Christian Thomasius (1655-1728) was seen as a hero of religious freedom and a champion of toleration. A similar portrait was caused by Thomasius’ important writings against sorcery, torture and heresy. Among them, the dissertation An haeresis sit crimen (1697) is noteworthy, also because it was criticized by Leibniz, who seems to think that heresy must be prosecuted. Does that mean that, contrarily to Thomasius, Leibniz held a conservative or even a reactionary position and supported intolerance? In the following, I will dwell upon this question, trying to show that Leibniz’ critics of Thomasius shall not be read as a refusal of religious toleration, but, on the contrary, as a different way – in a certain sense more effective – to support it.

Presentato

14 Dicembre 2016

Lingua

IT

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-133-1

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-132-4

Keywords: Heresy • Leibniz • Toleration • Absolutism • Christian Thomasius

permalink: http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-132-4/PHIL-3-6

Copyright: © 2017 Mariangela Priarolo. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.