The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals

« previous chapter | next chapter »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_3809
dc.contributor.author	Sparvoli Carlotta
dc.title	The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals. Exploring the Distribution Via Corpus-Based Approach
dc.type	Chapter
dc.language.iso	en
dc.description.abstract	This paper is intended to test the deontic vs anankastic hypothesis outlined by Sparvoli 2012. The stipulation is that, in past contexts, deontic modals trigger a counterfactual inference, while anankastic modals (here called ‘goal-oriented modals’) either trigger an actuality entailment effects (‘only possibility’ modals) or a generic non-factual reading (‘mere necessity’ modals). The result of this corpus-based study conducted in a Chinese-English parallel corpus confirm the crucial role played by the deontic vs goal-oriented contrast in the marking of factuality in Chinese and shows that the factuality value decreases across a cline from goal-oriented to deontic modals.
dc.relation.ispartof	Sinica venetiana
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.issued	2020-12-21
dc.dateAccepted	2020-10-14
dc.dateSubmitted	2020-03-04
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-407-3/the-factuality-status-of-chinese-necessity-modals/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-406-6/005
dc.identifier.issn	2610-9654
dc.identifier.eissn	2610-9042
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-407-3
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-406-6
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Actuality entailment
dc.subject	Actuality entailment
dc.subject	Counterfactuality
dc.subject	Counterfactuality
dc.subject	Deontic modality
dc.subject	Deontic modality
dc.subject	Goal-oriented modality
dc.subject	Goal-oriented modality

Chapter
open access peer reviewed

The Factuality Status of Chinese Necessity Modals

Exploring the Distribution Via Corpus-Based Approach

Carlotta Sparvoli Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

This paper is intended to test the deontic vs anankastic hypothesis outlined by Sparvoli 2012. The stipulation is that, in past contexts, deontic modals trigger a counterfactual inference, while anankastic modals (here called ‘goal-oriented modals’) either trigger an actuality entailment effects (‘only possibility’ modals) or a generic non-factual reading (‘mere necessity’ modals). The result of this corpus-based study conducted in a Chinese-English parallel corpus confirm the crucial role played by the deontic vs goal-oriented contrast in the marking of factuality in Chinese and shows that the factuality value decreases across a cline from goal-oriented to deontic modals.

Accepted

Oct. 14, 2020

Submitted

March 4, 2020

Language

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-407-3

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-406-6

Keywords: Goal-oriented modality • Actuality entailment • Counterfactuality • Deontic modality

permalink: http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-406-6/005

Copyright: © 2020 Carlotta Sparvoli. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite