Collana |
Antichistica
Miscellanea | La falsificazione epigrafica
Capitolo | Falso quando?
Falso quando?
- Antonio Sartori - Università di Milano, Italia - email
Abstract
An altar, found at Brenna (Como) and donated to the Civic Archaeological Collections of Milan in 1875, was never taken into account by scholars because it is unintelligible. The alleged text is sharply and skilfully engraved on at least 13 lines, but is composed of only partially alphabetic signs, devoid of any logical sense. Blaming the stonecutter of incompetence is too simplistic: the text was either proposed to him with scribbled and illegible notes, or had the function of occupying a physical space with no communication purposes, in order to give authoritativeness to the monument, whose owners were already known in other ways. In both cases, it was a forgery, either not corresponding to the original intention, or visibly added as a complementary filler.
Presentato: 03 Luglio 2019 | Accettato: 10 Settembre 2019 | Pubblicato 16 Dicembre 2019 | Lingua: it
Keywords Epigraph balanced between dimensions and inscripti • Non-alphabetic graphemes • Coarse altar • Inscribed zone as decorative surface • Forged blunder
Copyright © 2019 Antonio Sartori. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-386-1/013
-
La ricerca sulla falsificazione epigrafica oggi
Dove siamo e dove andiamo - Lorenzo Calvelli
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Monsignor Luigi Biraghi e i falsi di Cernusco
- Michele Bellomo, Silvia Gazzoli
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
Vicende di un falso senatoconsulto
Il decretum Rubiconis fra Ciriaco de’ Pizzicolli, Antonio Agustín e Eugen Bormann - Pierangelo Buongiorno
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- ‘Falsi’ epigrafici in Internet: una fenomenologia
- Silvia Braito, Alfredo Buonopane
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
Iscrizioni falsae nelle collezioni inglesi
Il caso del Fitzwilliam Museum di Cambridge - Maria Letizia Caldelli
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Lineamenti per una storia della critica della falsificazione epigrafica
- Lorenzo Calvelli
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
La (cattiva) coscienza del falsario
Ricerca e produzione di iscrizioni latine in Sardegna fra XVI e XIX secolo - Antonio Maria Corda, Antonio Ibba
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
Falsari piemontesi del XVI secolo
Monsù Pingon e gli altri - Silvia Giorcelli
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
Mariangelo Accursio and Pirro Ligorio
The Possible (and Interesting) Genesis of CIL VI 990* and CIL VI 991 - Gian Luca Gregori, Alessandro Papini
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Per uno studio dei falsi nel manoscritto inglese di Jacopo Valvasone di Maniago (1499-1570)
- Fulvia Mainardis
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- La città e i suoi falsi
- Silvia Maria Marengo
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
I falsi epigrafici di Giuseppe Francesco Meyranesio
Ispirazioni e modelli - Viviana Pettirossi
- 16 Dicembre 2019
-
Digitalizzazione e intelligenza del falso epigrafico
Il caso di un titulus atestino - Antonio Pistellato
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Falso quando?
- Antonio Sartori
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Il falsario Sententiosus
- Carlo Slavich
- 16 Dicembre 2019
- Pirro Ligorio et « l’histoire secrète » de la restauration de l’Acqua Vergine sous le pontificat de Pie IV (1559-65)
- Ginette Vagenheim
- 16 Dicembre 2019
| DC Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
dc.identifier |
ECF_chapter_3504 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sartori Antonio |
|
dc.title |
Falso quando? |
|
dc.type |
Capitolo |
|
dc.language.iso |
it |
|
dc.description.abstract |
An altar, found at Brenna (Como) and donated to the Civic Archaeological Collections of Milan in 1875, was never taken into account by scholars because it is unintelligible. The alleged text is sharply and skilfully engraved on at least 13 lines, but is composed of only partially alphabetic signs, devoid of any logical sense. Blaming the stonecutter of incompetence is too simplistic: the text was either proposed to him with scribbled and illegible notes, or had the function of occupying a physical space with no communication purposes, in order to give authoritativeness to the monument, whose owners were already known in other ways. In both cases, it was a forgery, either not corresponding to the original intention, or visibly added as a complementary filler. |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Antichistica |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Storia ed epigrafia |
|
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing |
|
dc.issued |
2019-12-16 |
|
dc.dateAccepted |
2019-09-10 |
|
dc.dateSubmitted |
2019-07-03 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-387-8/falso-quando/ |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.30687/978-88-6969-386-1/013 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2610-8828 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2610-9344 |
|
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-88-6969-387-8 |
|
dc.identifier.eisbn |
978-88-6969-386-1 |
|
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
|
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|
item.fulltext |
with fulltext |
|
item.grantfulltext |
open |
|
dc.peer-review |
yes |
|
dc.subject |
Coarse altar |
|
dc.subject |
Coarse altar |
|
dc.subject |
Epigraph balanced between dimensions and inscripti |
|
dc.subject |
Epigraph balanced between dimensions and inscripti |
|
dc.subject |
Forged blunder |
|
dc.subject |
Forged blunder |
|
dc.subject |
Inscribed zone as decorative surface |
|
dc.subject |
Inscribed zone as decorative surface |
|
dc.subject |
Non-alphabetic graphemes |
|
dc.subject |
Non-alphabetic graphemes |
| Download data |