Journal | Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale
Journal issue | 50 | 2016
Research Article | On Noun Clausal ‘Complements’ and their Non-unitary Nature
Abstract
In this article, we discuss the status of clausal ‘complements’ of Ns, which have recently been analysed by various authors as restrictive relative clauses. First we argue that they do not constitute a unitary phenomenon. Two types should be distinguished: clausal “complements” that can be predicated of the noun across a copula (with nouns like ‘claim’, ‘news’, ‘idea’, etc.) and those that cannot (with transitive nouns like ‘proof’ and with ‘unaccusative’ nouns like ‘possibility’). While we argue that both types are not genuine complements of the noun, we address some apparent difficulties for an ordinary restrictive relative clause analysis. Using data from English, Bulgarian and Italian we suggest that noun clausal “complements” of the first type are best analyzed as the predicate of a non-restrictive reduced relative clause, ultimately derived from an inverse (specificational) copular structure where the “complement” clause that expresses the content of the N occupies the subject position and the Noun the predicate position ([[CP That he is a spy] Pred° [DP the claim]]). Concerning noun clausal “complements” of the second type we tentatively assume that they involve the relativization of a propositional variable, as suggested by a number of authors.
Submitted: April 12, 2016 | Accepted: July 11, 2016 | Published Sept. 30, 2016 | Language: it
Keywords Inverse predication • Noun complements • Reduced relative clauses • Unaccusative nouns
Copyright © 2016 Guglielmo Cinque, Iliyana Krapova. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/2499-1562/AnnOc-50-16-4
Linguistics
Literature, Culture, History
DC Field | Value |
---|---|
dc.identifier |
ECF_article_360 |
dc.title |
On Noun Clausal ‘Complements’ and their Non-unitary Nature |
dc.contributor.author |
Cinque Guglielmo |
dc.contributor.author |
Krapova Iliyana |
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing |
dc.type |
Research Article |
dc.language.iso |
it |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/annali-di-ca-foscari-serie-occidentale/2016/1/on-noun-clausal-complements-and-their-non-unitary/ |
dc.description.abstract |
In this article, we discuss the status of clausal ‘complements’ of Ns, which have recently been analysed by various authors as restrictive relative clauses. First we argue that they do not constitute a unitary phenomenon. Two types should be distinguished: clausal “complements” that can be predicated of the noun across a copula (with nouns like ‘claim’, ‘news’, ‘idea’, etc.) and those that cannot (with transitive nouns like ‘proof’ and with ‘unaccusative’ nouns like ‘possibility’). While we argue that both types are not genuine complements of the noun, we address some apparent difficulties for an ordinary restrictive relative clause analysis. Using data from English, Bulgarian and Italian we suggest that noun clausal “complements” of the first type are best analyzed as the predicate of a non-restrictive reduced relative clause, ultimately derived from an inverse (specificational) copular structure where the “complement” clause that expresses the content of the N occupies the subject position and the Noun the predicate position ([[CP That he is a spy] Pred° [DP the claim]]). Concerning noun clausal “complements” of the second type we tentatively assume that they involve the relativization of a propositional variable, as suggested by a number of authors. |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Vol. 50 | September 2016 |
dc.issued |
2016-09-30 |
dc.dateAccepted |
2016-07-11 |
dc.dateSubmitted |
2016-04-12 |
dc.identifier.issn |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2499-1562 |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.14277/2499-1562/AnnOc-50-16-4 |
dc.peer-review |
yes |
dc.subject |
Inverse predication |
dc.subject |
Inverse predication |
dc.subject |
Noun complements |
dc.subject |
Noun complements |
dc.subject |
Reduced relative clauses |
dc.subject |
Reduced relative clauses |
dc.subject |
Unaccusative nouns |
dc.subject |
Unaccusative nouns |
Download data |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari
Dorsoduro 3246
30123 Venezia
ecf@unive.it
T +39 041 234 8250
Evologi srl
P.IVA 04616450260