Quality Assessment of Digital Elevation Models in a Treeless High-Mountainous…

« articolo precedente | articolo successivo »

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_article_5055
dc.title	Quality Assessment of Digital Elevation Models in a Treeless High-Mountainous Landscape. A Case Study from Mount Aragats, Armenia
dc.contributor.author	Elicker Julia
dc.contributor.author	Hnila Pavol
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type	Articolo
dc.language.iso	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni4/riviste/magazen/2021/1/quality-assessment-of-digital-elevation-models-in/
dc.description.abstract	Global Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) are widely employed in geoarchaeology. Usually, their adequacy for particular landscapes is not tested. We assessed 30m-resolution-DEMs (ASTER, SRTM, ALOS, EU-DEM, NASADEM, NEXTMap) with local precision datasets. Our results reveal considerable differences (ASTER unsuitable for the region, NEXTMap and EU-DEM fit most closely to our reference model). This outcome does not necessarily apply to all similar regions. It rather stresses the need for a check of DEMs’ quality in any given study area, and it encourages the use of detailed topographic visualisations of DEMs in absence of suitable reference data.
dc.relation.ispartof	magazén
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 2 \| Num. 1 \| Giugno 2021
dc.issued	2021-06-30
dc.dateAccepted	2021-05-05
dc.dateSubmitted	2021-01-15
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2724-3923
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/mag/2724-3923/2021/03/003
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	30m resolution DEMs
dc.subject	30m resolution DEMs
dc.subject	Comparison
dc.subject	Comparison
dc.subject	Evaluation
dc.subject	Evaluation
dc.subject	GIS
dc.subject	GIS
dc.subject	Landscape archaeology
dc.subject	Landscape archaeology
dc.subject	RMSE
dc.subject	RMSE
dc.subject	Spatial analysis
dc.subject	Spatial analysis

Articolo
open access peer reviewed

Quality Assessment of Digital Elevation Models in a Treeless High-Mountainous Landscape

A Case Study from Mount Aragats, Armenia

Pavol Hnila Freie Universität Berlin, Deutschland

Julia Elicker Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Deutschland

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Global Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) are widely employed in geoarchaeology. Usually, their adequacy for particular landscapes is not tested. We assessed 30m-resolution-DEMs (ASTER, SRTM, ALOS, EU-DEM, NASADEM, NEXTMap) with local precision datasets. Our results reveal considerable differences (ASTER unsuitable for the region, NEXTMap and EU-DEM fit most closely to our reference model). This outcome does not necessarily apply to all similar regions. It rather stresses the need for a check of DEMs’ quality in any given study area, and it encourages the use of detailed topographic visualisations of DEMs in absence of suitable reference data.

Subtags: Monuments Technology Environment Communication Geo-referenced data Visualisation Modelling 3d data Analysis

Pubblicato

30 Giugno 2021

Accettato

05 Maggio 2021

Presentato

15 Gennaio 2021

Lingua

Keywords: 30m resolution DEMs • Landscape archaeology • Evaluation • GIS • RMSE • Comparison • Spatial analysis

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/mag/2724-3923/2021/03/003

Copyright: © 2021 Pavol Hnila, Julia Elicker. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite