La competenza scritta in italiano L2 di apprendenti vulnerabili

« articolo precedente | articolo successivo »

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_article_2946
dc.title	La competenza scritta in italiano L2 di apprendenti vulnerabili. Due scale di valutazione a confronto
dc.contributor.author	De Meo Anna
dc.contributor.author	Maffia Marta
dc.contributor.author	Vitale Giuseppina
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type	Articolo
dc.language.iso	it
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/riviste/elle/2019/3/la-competenza-scritta-in-italiano-l2-di-apprendent/
dc.description.abstract	The high number of low-literate vulnerable refugees and asylum seekers among L2 Italian learners requires a rethinking not only of approaches and teaching methods, but also of assessment strategies. The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of two different rating scales in the assessment of writing skills for this peculiar target of learners, a Standard Evaluation Scale and a Functional Adequacy Scale. Application of the two assessment methods on a corpus of about 450 written texts produced by 50 refugees and asylum seekers from 16 different countries, with an Italian A2 level competence, demonstrated that a Functional Adequacy Scale can be a more reliable and efficient tool than a Standard Evaluation Scale for valorising also poor writing skills, instead of underlying the limits of low-literate productions.
dc.relation.ispartof	EL.LE
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 8 \| Num. 3 \| Novembre 2019
dc.issued	2020-06-04
dc.dateAccepted	2019-12-01
dc.dateSubmitted	2019-05-02
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2280-6792
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/ELLE/2280-6792/2019/03/007
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Adult refugees
dc.subject	Adult refugees
dc.subject	Functional Adequacy Scale
dc.subject	Functional Adequacy Scale
dc.subject	L2 Italian
dc.subject	L2 Italian
dc.subject	Standard Evaluation Scale
dc.subject	Standard Evaluation Scale
dc.subject	Written competence
dc.subject	Written competence

Articolo
open access peer reviewed

Due scale di valutazione a confronto

Anna De Meo Università degli Studi di Napoli «L’Orientale», Italia

Marta Maffia Università degli Studi di Napoli «L’Orientale», Italia

Giuseppina Vitale Università degli Studi Roma Tre, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

The high number of low-literate vulnerable refugees and asylum seekers among L2 Italian learners requires a rethinking not only of approaches and teaching methods, but also of assessment strategies. The present study aims to investigate the effectiveness of two different rating scales in the assessment of writing skills for this peculiar target of learners, a Standard Evaluation Scale and a Functional Adequacy Scale. Application of the two assessment methods on a corpus of about 450 written texts produced by 50 refugees and asylum seekers from 16 different countries, with an Italian A2 level competence, demonstrated that a Functional Adequacy Scale can be a more reliable and efficient tool than a Standard Evaluation Scale for valorising also poor writing skills, instead of underlying the limits of low-literate productions.

Pubblicato

04 Giugno 2020

Accettato

01 Dicembre 2019

Presentato

02 Maggio 2019

Lingua

Keywords: L2 Italian • Written competence • Adult refugees • Standard Evaluation Scale • Functional Adequacy Scale

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/ELLE/2280-6792/2019/03/007

Copyright: © 2019 Anna De Meo, Marta Maffia, Giuseppina Vitale. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite