Innovative or Rather Traditional? Confucianising Tragedy in May Fourth China

« capitolo precedente | capitolo successivo »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_4000
dc.contributor.author	Fusini Letizia
dc.title	Innovative or Rather Traditional? Confucianising Tragedy in May Fourth China
dc.type	Capitolo
dc.language.iso	en
dc.description.abstract	A key aspect of the May Fourth Movement was the critical discussion of Western tragedy. While the interest in tragedy was sparked by the assumption that China lacked an analogous genre, its interpretation and adaptation to the Chinese context suggests that a traditional ‘indigenous’ filter was applied to define its supposed ‘modernity’. Through cross-comparing Chinese conceptions of beiju 悲剧 in the May Fourth era and traditional Chinese views of bei 悲, this paper will seek to show that the Chinese reception of tragedy was informed by the rejuvenation of traditional ideas rather than the introduction of purely ‘Western’ theories.
dc.relation.ispartof	Translating Wor(l)ds
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.issued	2020-12-21
dc.dateAccepted	2020-09-07
dc.dateSubmitted	2020-05-21
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-465-3/innovative-or-rather-traditional-confucianising-tr/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-465-3/001
dc.identifier.issn	2610-9131
dc.identifier.eissn	2610-914X
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-494-3
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-465-3
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Beiju, 悲剧
dc.subject	Beiju, 悲剧
dc.subject	May Fourth movement
dc.subject	May Fourth movement
dc.subject	Melancholy
dc.subject	Melancholy
dc.subject	Modernity
dc.subject	Modernity
dc.subject	Sadness
dc.subject	Sadness
dc.subject	Tragedy
dc.subject	Tragedy

Capitolo
open access peer reviewed

Innovative or Rather Traditional? Confucianising Tragedy in May Fourth China

Letizia Fusini SOAS, University of London

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

A key aspect of the May Fourth Movement was the critical discussion of Western tragedy. While the interest in tragedy was sparked by the assumption that China lacked an analogous genre, its interpretation and adaptation to the Chinese context suggests that a traditional ‘indigenous’ filter was applied to define its supposed ‘modernity’. Through cross-comparing Chinese conceptions of beiju 悲剧 in the May Fourth era and traditional Chinese views of bei 悲, this paper will seek to show that the Chinese reception of tragedy was informed by the rejuvenation of traditional ideas rather than the introduction of purely ‘Western’ theories.

Pubblicato

21 Dicembre 2020

Accettato

07 Settembre 2020

Presentato

21 Maggio 2020

Lingua

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-494-3

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-465-3

Keywords: Tragedy • Sadness • Beiju, 悲剧 • Melancholy • Modernity • May Fourth movement

permalink: http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-465-3/001

Copyright: © 2020 Letizia Fusini. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite