Antichistica

Digitalizzazione e intelligenza del falso epigrafico

Il caso di un titulus atestino

crossmark logo

Abstract

This essay focuses upon a fragmentary Latin inscription found in Monselice in 1837. Giuseppe first Furlanetto published it in 1847. In 1872, Theodor Mommsen published it as CIL V 2484. However, among Furlanetto’s work materials there is a manuscript note that relates to the same inscription, but shows an intact epigraphic text. Maria Silvia Bassignano published it in 1997, maintaining that the inscription was a forgery. The digitization of the note in EDF, a re-examination of all extant documentation, the books of Livy, and a new analysis of the original inscription, now in Brescia, allow a reassessment of the whole matter, and prompt some methodological and epistemological remarks on the notion of epigraphic forgery.


Open access | Peer reviewed

Presentato: 03 Luglio 2019 | Accettato: 10 Settembre 2019 | Pubblicato 16 Dicembre 2019 | Lingua: it

Keywords Forgery • Digital editions • Printed editions • Latin epigraphy • Manuscripts

Copyright © 2019 Antonio Pistellato. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-386-1/012


leggi questo capitolo