Studi ciprioti

     topic: filologie   filosofia, antropologia e religione   storia  
Presentazione

La serie Studi ciprioti promuove la pubblicazione di ricerche innovative e interdisciplinari su Cipro.

In tutte le fasi della sua storia plurimillenaria, Cipro si è caratterizzata significativamente per la coesistenza di una peculiare identità insulare e di una spiccata propensione alla connettività. Tali prerogative la rendono una realtà geografica poliedrica e, al tempo stesso, un laboratorio permanente di elaborazione di una koiné mediterranea.

Con l'intento di interpretare in profondità il fenomeno cipriota, la collana promuove la pubblicazione di monografie e raccolte di studi, in italiano, inglese e altre lingue strategiche per la comunità scientifica internazionale. I volumi nella collana trattano di Cipro dal punto di vista archeologico e storico, artistico e letterario, linguistico e filologico, religioso e antropologico, dalla preistoria al mondo contemporaneo. Incoraggiando lo studio di Cipro da ogni prospettiva nel contesto delle scienze umane, questa nuova serie colma un’evidente lacuna nel mondo delle pubblicazioni accademiche e aspira a essere considerata un modello innovativo per altri studi regionali.

Informazioni generali

Comitati
  • peopleComitati
    General Editors
    Luca Bombardieri, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia  
    Tommaso Braccini, Università degli Studi di Siena, Italia  
    Lorenzo Calvelli, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia  
    Luigi Silvano, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia  

    Advisory Board
    Benjamin Arbel, Tel Aviv University, Israel  
    Anna Cannavò, Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, Lyon, France  
    Annemarie Weyl Carr, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, USA  
    Jody Michael Gordon, Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, USA  
    Gilles Grivaud, Université de Rouen, France  
    Robert Holland, School of Advanced Study, London, UK  
    Maria Iakovou, University of Cyprus, Cyprus  
    Bernard Knapp, University of Glasgow, UK  
    Demetrios Michaelides, University of Cyprus, Cyprus  
    Tassos Papacostas, King's College, London, UK  
    Eirini Papadaki, University of Cyprus, Cyprus  
    Brigitta Schrade, Freie Universität Berlin, Deutschland  
    Theoharis Stavrides, University of Cyprus, Cyprus  

Proposte / Contatti

Per sottoporre una proposta di pubblicazione utilizza il form qui disponibile.

mode_edit FORM

APCs

I costi di pubblicazioni sono regolamentati dall’Editore. Tutte le informazioni sono disponibili alla pagina Pubblicare con noi.

Peer review

Le opere pubblicate hanno ottenuto il parere favorevole da parte di almeno due valutatori esperti della materia, attraverso un processo di revisione anonima (double-blind peer review) condotto sotto la responsabilità della Direzione scientifica della collana. I revisori non hanno contatti diretti con gli Autori e appartengono a istituzioni di ricerca diverse da quella cui la collana è affiliata.

La valutazione è svolta in conformità e aderenza ai criteri scientifici, e ai criteri editoriali di completezza bibliografica e coerenza formale di Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

Politiche di revisione per le singole sezioni:

  • Volume/Fascicolo completo: peer review
  • Introduzioni, prefazioni: senza peer review
  • Monografie | Saggi | Articoli: peer review
  • Recensioni: no peer review
  • Editoriali: no peer review

Per una descrizione dettagliata del processo, si prega di consultare la pagina: Certificazione scientifica.

Archivio
Le nostre collane e riviste sono archiviate su PHAIDRA (Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets), piattaforma di archiviazione a lungo termine di oggetti e collezioni digitali: PHAIDRA.
Policy
  • listPolicy

    Ethical Code of Studi ciprioti

    Studi ciprioti is a peer-reviewed scientific book series whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code.

    Publisher’s responsibilities  

    The Publisher must provide the Book Series with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.

    The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Book Series and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.

    The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence. 

    Editors’ responsibilities 

    The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Studi ciprioti alone are responsible for the decision to publish the submitted works.

    Submitted works, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief.

    The Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Book Seriesʼ policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors. 

    Allegations of misconduct

    If the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published book, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the book or publish a recantation.

    All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.

    Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:

    • complainant’s personal information;
    • title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
    • complaint(s);
    • declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.

    Authors’ responsibilities

    Stylesheet

    Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Studi ciprioti website.

    No multiple submissions

    Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other publishers, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper or book gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief. 

    Authorship

    Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.

    Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the book is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.

    The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.

    Conflicts of interest and financing

    Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the book stems from. 

    Quotations

    Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation. 

    Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.

    Ethical Committee

    Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 

    Emendations

    When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own work, they must immediately warn the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments. 

    Reviewers’ responsibilities

    Goal

    By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the submitted works. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission. 

    Timing and conflicts of interest

    If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Studi ciprioti Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept texts for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified). 

    Confidentiality

    The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.

    Collaborative attitude

    Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”. 

    Plagiarism

    Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.