Series | Italianistica. Nuova serie
Volume 4 | Edited book | La tradizione prosimetrica in volgare da Dante a Bembo
La tradizione prosimetrica in volgare da Dante a Bembo
Atti del convegno internazionale di studi (Venezia, 26-27 giugno 2023)
open access | peer reviewed-
edited by
- Matteo Favaretto - Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia - email
Abstract
The present volume brings together papers given at the International Conference on the vernacular tradition of the prosimetrum from Dante to Bembo, which took place last summer at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice at the end of a Marie Sklodowska-Curie postdoctoral fellowship. The conference followed on from a seminar held at the University of Trento over twenty-five years ago; however, the focus was on the mixed texts composed in the early centuries instead of embracing the entire period of Italian literature.
The bibliography on these vernacular works considered as a whole is quite limited in comparison to that on the prosimetric production in classical and medieval Latin. Further, it is difficult to establish a satisfactory definition of prosimetrum which goes beyond the etymological meaning described – with few different nuances – in both the early Artes Dictandi and in modern treatises of metrics. Dante’s Vita Nova, the first – and in many respects exceptional – example of this vernacular tradition, does not offer a suitable model for the abundant prosimetra written in the subsequent two centuries, which were characterized by a considerable variety of themes and genres. Therefore, it seemed preferable to reconsider the subject and look closely at all those texts in which the evident alternation of prose sections and poetic compositions conformed to a precise authorial intent on the basis of a relationship of mutual dependence.
The papers collected here are intended to offer fresh insights into both famous and lesser-known prosimetra, written between approximately 1250 and 1500, in order to advance our understanding of this hybrid literary phenomenon. Each contributor takes a single prosimetrum focusing either on the interaction between prose and verse or any other relevant aspect, such as textual tradition and critical analysis of the poems, in line with the standard form that was used to examine the works included in the online inventory available at www.unive.it/inprov.
Keywords Lout • Visionary Tale • Prose • Lorenzo de’ Medici • Pastoral poetry • Trattato d’una angelica cosa • Iacopo Sannazaro • Self-commentary • Vita Nova • Decameron • Terza rima • Dante • Copyists • Sex • Vernacular translation • Vernacular • Doctrinal Prose • Ser Giovanni • Nicolosa bella • Giandino da Carmignano • Letters • Morality • Eclogues • Giovanni Gherardi da Prato • Courtesy • Poems • Asolani • Spiritual poetry • Platonism • Philosophy • Novellas • Filelfo • Florentine Renaissance • Italy • Love • Pecorone • Vernacular tradition • Jealousy • Structure • Canzone • Authorship • Girolamo Benivieni • Manuscript tradition • Petrarch • Bono Giamboni • Gianotto Calogrosso • Boccaccio • Brevitas • Siena • French literature • Lyric poetry • Sonnet • Renaissance • Good governance • Sercambi • Florence • Felice Feliciano • Poetry • Semantic ambiguity • Stanze • Early Modern Period • Convivio • Domenico da Prato • Canzoniere • Marsilio Ficino • Pietro Bembo • Commentary • Boezio • Didacticism • Comedia delle Ninfe Fiorentine • Ballads • Ameto • Bembo • Chivalric literature • Italian literature • Tesoretto • Codicology • Prosimetrum • Novella • Novelliere • Brunetto Latini • Boethius • Ballata • Petrarchism
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-821-7 | e-ISBN 978-88-6969-821-7 | ISBN (PRINT) 978-88-6969-822-4 | Published July 17, 2024 | Language it
Copyright © 2024 Matteo Favaretto. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
