Rivista |
JoLMA
Fascicolo | 4 | 2 | 2023
The philosophical reflection stemming from actual scientific practice has been proven to have the potential to inform ethical thinking and political practice with a more robust foundation than those not necessarily linked to scientific developments. This is not, of course, to argue for an alleged preeminence of science over speculative philosophical reflection, nor that scientific practices should remain untouched by science-informed philosophy. On the contrary, history and anthropology of science function as antidotes to similar unfounded views. Recent scientific and technological discoveries require a stronger role for philosophy in public and institutional discussions. Their practical consequences for humans and non-humans cannot be ignored.
Keywords New materialism • Animal cognition • Generativity • Relational Value • Plant Cognition • Posthuman • Unification • Cybernetics • Extending cognition • Microbiome • Memory • Ontological Turn • Philosophy of Mind • Pluralism • Gut-brain axis • Posthumanism • Computation • Mind • Metaphilosophy • Cognitive ontology • Evolution of cognition • Multispecies justice • Unconventional Cognitive System • Zoopsychism • Social struggles • Biopsychism • Plant cognition • Animal ethics • Biogenic approach • Holism • Basal cognition • Concepts • Cognition • Anthropomorphism • Environmental ethics • Self • Climate justice • Enactivism
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/02 | Pubblicato 20 Dicembre 2023 | Lingua en
Copyright © Filippo Batisti. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
De-Humanizing Cognition, Intelligence, and Agency. A Critical Assessment Between Philosophy, Ethics, and Science