Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice

« articolo precedente | articolo successivo »

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_article_13530
dc.title	Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice. A Conversation on Framing and Reframing
dc.contributor.author	Bal Mieke
dc.contributor.author	Baldacci Cristina
dc.contributor.author	Conte Pietro
dc.contributor.author	Franco Susanne
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Venice University Press, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type	Articolo
dc.language.iso	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/it/edizioni4/riviste/the-journal-for-the-philosophy-of-language-mind-an/2023/1/bridging-the-gap-between-theory-and-practice/
dc.description.abstract	In this conversation, Mieke Bal retraces the perimeter of her analytically based art practice and her practice-based theoretical work, taking advantage of the operational concept of frame but also of the many actions it generates – such as framing, unframing, de-framing, and re-framing. She considers the act of framing, understood as a first gesture of interpretation, much more useful than the noun itself for our understanding of the effects and meanings of art. Framing as an action can also potentially subvert the traditional, linear, and chronological views of time, bringing into question unilateral thinking. From this perspective, re-framing does not mean doing something again but doing something different – that is, something new – while unframing, instead of a refusal of the act of framing, is to put chaos into an artwork.
dc.relation.ispartof	JoLMA
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 4 \| Num. 1 \| Giugno 2023
dc.issued	2023-09-25
dc.dateSubmitted	2023-05-26
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2723-9640
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/01/001
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Art theory
dc.subject	Framing
dc.subject	Interpretation
dc.subject	Reframing
dc.subject	Visual Culture Studies

Articolo
open access peer reviewed

A Conversation on Framing and Reframing

Susanne Franco Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia

Pietro Conte Ca' Foscari University of Venice

Cristina Baldacci Ca' Foscari University of Venice

Mieke Bal University of Amsterdam

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

In this conversation, Mieke Bal retraces the perimeter of her analytically based art practice and her practice-based theoretical work, taking advantage of the operational concept of frame but also of the many actions it generates – such as framing, unframing, de-framing, and re-framing. She considers the act of framing, understood as a first gesture of interpretation, much more useful than the noun itself for our understanding of the effects and meanings of art. Framing as an action can also potentially subvert the traditional, linear, and chronological views of time, bringing into question unilateral thinking. From this perspective, re-framing does not mean doing something again but doing something different – that is, something new – while unframing, instead of a refusal of the act of framing, is to put chaos into an artwork.

Pubblicato

25 Settembre 2023

Presentato

26 Maggio 2023

Lingua

Keywords: Reframing • Art theory • Interpretation • Framing • Visual Culture Studies

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/01/001

Copyright: © 2023 Susanne Franco, Pietro Conte, Cristina Baldacci, Mieke Bal. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite