Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica

     topic: culture dell’eurasia e delle americhe   lingue e linguistica  
Presentazione

La collana Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica pubblica monografie e raccolte di saggi di elevato rigore scientifico suddivisi fra le aree linguistiche e culturali dello spagnolo, dell’ispano-americano, del luso-brasiliano, del catalano, del basco e del galiziano. Essa è destinata ad ospitare pubblicazioni che scaturiscono dalle attività di ricerca di Ca’ Foscari e pubblicazioni di studiosi e istituzioni italiane e straniere. Si propone come luogo privilegiato per la discussione sugli strumenti con i quali indagare le nostre materie in base a innovative prospettive teoriche e storiche. Compendio e progetto interdisciplinare, pubblica libri che trattano tutti gli aspetti della cultura iberica e iberoamericana.

Informazioni generali

Comitati
  • peopleComitati
    Direzione scientifica
    Enric Bou, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

    Comitato scientifico
    Raul Antelo, Universidad Federal de Santa Catarina, Brasil  
    Luisa Campuzano, Universidad de la Habana; Casa de las Américas, Cuba    
    Ivo Castro, Universiade de Lisboa, Portugal    
    Pedro Cátedra, Universidade de Salamanca, España    
    Luz Elena Gutiérrez, El Colegio de México    
    Hans Lauge Hansen, Aarhus University, Danmark    
    Noé Jitrich, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina    
    Alfons Knauth, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Deutschland    
    Dante Liano, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Milano, Italia    
    Alfredo Martínez-Expósito, University of Melbourne, Australia    
    Antonio Monegal, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, España    
    José Portolés Lázaro, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España    
    Marco Presotto, Università di Trento, Italia    
    Joan Ramon Resina, Stanford University, USA    
    Pedro Ruiz Pérez, Universidad de Córdoba, España    
    Silvana Serafin, Università degli Studi di Udine, Italia    
    Roberto Vecchi, Università di Bologna, Italia    
    Marc Vitse, Université Toulouse-Le Mirail, France    

    Comitato di redazione
    Ignacio Arroyo Hernández, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Margherita Cannavacciuolo, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Vanessa Castagna, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Marcella Ciceri, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Dal Maso Elena, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Donatella Ferro, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Nadal Laura, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    René Lenarduzzi, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Paola Mildonian, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Alessandro Mistrorigo, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Simas Mônica, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    María del Valle Ojeda, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Elide Pittarello, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Susanna Regazzoni, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Patrizio Rigobon, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Eugenia Sainz, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Alessandro Scarsella, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Manuel G. Simões, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Patrizia Spinato, CNR, Roma, Italia    
    Adrián J. Sáez, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Giuseppe Trovato, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Florencio del Barrio, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

Proposte / Contatti

Per sottoporre una proposta di pubblicazione utilizza il form qui disponibile.

mode_edit FORM

Direzione e redazione
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
Dipartimento di Studi Linguistici e Culturali Comparati
Ca’ Bernardo
Dorsoduro 3199
30123 Venezia
rassegna.iberistica@unive.it
APCs

I costi di pubblicazioni sono regolamentati dall’Editore. Tutte le informazioni sono disponibili alla pagina Pubblicare con noi.

Peer review

Le opere pubblicate hanno ottenuto il parere favorevole da parte di almeno due valutatori esperti della materia, attraverso un processo di revisione anonima (double-blind peer review) condotto sotto la responsabilità della Direzione scientifica della collana. I revisori non hanno contatti diretti con gli Autori e appartengono a istituzioni di ricerca diverse da quella cui la collana è affiliata.

La valutazione è svolta in conformità e aderenza ai criteri scientifici, e ai criteri editoriali di completezza bibliografica e coerenza formale di Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

Politiche di revisione per le singole sezioni:

  • Volume/Fascicolo completo: peer review
  • Introduzioni, prefazioni: senza peer review
  • Monografie | Saggi | Articoli: peer review
  • Recensioni: no peer review
  • Editoriali: no peer review

Per una descrizione dettagliata del processo, si prega di consultare la pagina: Certificazione scientifica.

Archivio
Le nostre collane e riviste sono archiviate su PHAIDRA (Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets), piattaforma di archiviazione a lungo termine di oggetti e collezioni digitali: PHAIDRA.
Policy
  • listPolicy

    Ethical Code of Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica

    Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica is a peer-reviewed scientific book series whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code.

    Publisher’s responsibilities  

    The Publisher must provide the Book Series with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.

    The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Book Series and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.

    The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence. 

    Editors’ responsibilities 

    The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica alone are responsible for the decision to publish the submitted works.

    Submitted works, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief.

    The Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Book Seriesʼ policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors. 

    Allegations of misconduct

    If the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published book, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the book or publish a recantation.

    All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.

    Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:

    • complainant’s personal information;
    • title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
    • complaint(s);
    • declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.

    Authors’ responsibilities

    Stylesheet

    Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica website.

    No multiple submissions

    Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other publishers, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper or book gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief. 

    Authorship

    Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.

    Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the book is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.

    The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.

    Conflicts of interest and financing

    Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the book stems from. 

    Quotations

    Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation. 

    Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.

    Ethical Committee

    Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 

    Emendations

    When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own work, they must immediately warn the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments. 

    Reviewers’ responsibilities

    Goal

    By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the submitted works. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission. 

    Timing and conflicts of interest

    If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Biblioteca di Rassegna iberistica Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept texts for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified). 

    Confidentiality

    The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.

    Collaborative attitude

    Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”. 

    Plagiarism

    Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.