Often met with suspicion, practices of ‘fusion’ between neighbouring disciplines simultaneously build on and reinforce complementarities between them. I argue that the key advantage of identifying and exploring such complementarities is the opportunity for improved understanding of the interaction of time and space in the history of art – i.e. how temporal tendencies unfold across geographical space. New digital sources of information on artistic careers, museum and personal collections or important sales make it possible to chart the mobility of people, artworks and concepts across time and space. A combination of computer algorithms, sociological methods and historical data provide opportunities to address substantive questions in the history of art, to identify patterns and resolve controversies. As an example of synergies in data collection and analysis between sociological and historical research, I analyse data on the students of Antoine Bourdelle. Results expose the interaction between centrality and two types of marginality, based on gender and the country of origin, and that between mobility of artists and the fragmentation of the field, as key factors in the acceleration of innovation at that time.
Submitted: July 15, 2020 | Accepted: Oct. 13, 2020 | Published: Dec. 2, 2020 .
Copyright © 2020 Stoyan V. Sgourev. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.