Armeniaca

International Journal of Armenian Studies
Presentazione

Siamo lieti di annunciare la nascita della rivista online Armeniaca. International Journal of Armenian Studies per le Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. L’iniziativa parte dalla constatazione della sempre maggiore diffusione delle riviste scientifiche elettroniche, e dal desiderio di dotare anche l’armenistica di un analogo strumento digitale, caratterizzato dall’open access gratuito e dalla double-blind peer review. A questo scopo, le quattro sedi universitarie italiane nelle quali sono presenti gli studi armenistici (Bologna, Firenze, Pisa e Venezia), si sono unite dando vita al presente progetto. La rivista nasce in una prospettiva di ampia apertura internazionale, che si riflette nella composizione del comitato scientifico, costituito da armenisti appartenenti a istituzioni di ricerca di diversi paesi europei ed extraeuropei. Aperta ai principali settori dell’Armenistica (archeologia, arte, filologia, letteratura, linguistica, storia), accetterà contributi in inglese, italiano, francese, e tedesco.

Informazioni generali

Comitati
  • peopleComitati
    Direzione scientifica
    Aldo Ferrari, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Alessandro Orengo, Università di Pisa, Italia    
    Zaroui Pogossian, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia    
    Anna Sirinian, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Italia    

    Comitato scientifico
    Arsen Bobokhyan, Yerevan State University, Armenia  
    Azad Bozoyan, Armenian National Academy of Sciences, Yerevan, Armenia  
    Valentina Calzolari, Université de Genève, Suisse  
    Peter Cowe, University of California, USA  
    Patrick Donabédian, Aix-Marseille Université, France  
    Bálint Kovács, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary  
    Michele Nucciotti, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Italia  
    Riccardo Pane, Archivio Generale Arcivescovile di Bologna, Italia  
    Andrea Scala, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia  
    Giancarlo Schirru, Università degli Studi di Napoli “L’Orientale”, Italia  
    Theo Maarten van Lint, University of Oxford, UK  
    Edda Vardanyan, Matenadaran – The Mesrop Mashtots Institute of Ancient Manuscripts, Yerevan, Armenia  

    Direttore responsabile
    Aldo Ferrari, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

Proposte / Contatti

Per sottoporre una proposta di pubblicazione utilizza il form qui disponibile.

mode_edit FORM

APCs

I costi di pubblicazioni sono regolamentati dall’Editore. Tutte le informazioni sono disponibili alla pagina Publish with us.

Peer review

Gli articoli pubblicati hanno ottenuto il parere favorevole da parte di almeno due valutatori esperti della materia, attraverso un processo di revisione anonima (double-blind peer review) condotto sotto la responsabilità della Direzione scientifica della rivista. I revisori non hanno contatti diretti con gli Autori e appartengono a istituzioni di ricerca diverse da quella cui la rivista è affiliata.

La valutazione è svolta in conformità e aderenza ai criteri scientifici, e ai criteri editoriali di completezza bibliografica e coerenza formale di Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.

Politiche di revisione per le singole sezioni:

  • Volume/Fascicolo completo: peer review
  • Introduzioni, prefazioni: senza peer review
  • Monografie | Saggi | Articoli: peer review
  • Recensioni: no peer review
  • Editoriali: no peer review

Per una descrizione dettagliata del processo, si prega di consultare la pagina: Certificazione scientifica.

Archivio
Le nostre collane e riviste sono archiviate su PHAIDRA (Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets), piattaforma di archiviazione a lungo termine di oggetti e collezioni digitali: PHAIDRA.
Norme redazionali
  • listNorme redazionali

    Il rispetto delle norme redazionali è condizione indispensabile per l’accettazione dei testi. L’editore (ECF) può decidere di sospendere — in ogni momento — la pubblicazione degli articoli in caso di loro mancato o scorretto impiego.

    Le norme comprendono, come loro parti integranti, le istruzioni per la composizione del file di testo, dell’abstract e dell’apparato bibliografico, scaricabili dal menu ’Pubblicare con noi’ alla voce ‘Norme redazionali’.

    • Preparazione di un documento
    • Struttura base di un documento
    • Composizione del testo
    • Sistema di riferimento bibliografico
    • Bibliografia generale

    Per informazioni e chiarimenti, si invita a contattare la redazione di Edizioni Ca’ Foscari all’indirizzo ecf@unive.it.


    ------------------


    Armenian romanization table

    աa
    բb
    գg
    դd
    եe
    զz
    էē
    ըə
    թt‘
    ժž
    իi
    լl
    խx
    ծc
    կk
    hh
    ձj
    ղł
    ճč
    մm
    յy
    նn
    շš
    ոo
    չč‘
    պp
    ջǰ
    ռ
    սs
    վv
    տt
    րr
    ցc‘
    ւw
    փp‘
    քk‘
    օō
    ֆf
    ուu


    NB: Please always use left single quotation mark ‘ (U+2018; ALT+3) to render aspirated consonants.



    Russian romanization table

    aa
    бb
    вv
    гg
    дd
    ee
    ёё
    жž
    зz
    иi
    йj
    кk
    лl
    мm
    нn
    oo
    пp
    рr
    cs
    тt
    уu
    фf
    хx
    цc
    чč
    шš
    щšč
    ъ
    ыy
    ь
    эė
    юju
    яja


    NB: Please always use right double quotation mark ” (U + 201D; ALT + ⇧ Shift + 2) to render the ‘hard sign’ and right single quotation mark ’ (U + 2019; ALT + ⇧ Shift + 3) to render the ‘soft sign’.

Policy
  • listCodice etico della Rivista

    Ethical Code of Armeniaca. International Journal of Armenian Studies

    Armeniaca. International Journal of Armenian Studies is a peer-reviewed scientific journal whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code. See the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

    Publisher’s responsibilities  

    The Publisher must provide the Journal with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.

    The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Journal and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.

    The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence. 

    Editors’ responsibilities 

    The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Armeniaca alone are responsible for the decision to publish the articles submitted.

    Submitted articles, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief.

    The Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Journalʼs policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors. 

    Allegations of misconduct

    If the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published article, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the article or publish a recantation.

    All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.

    Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:

    • complainant’s personal information;
    • title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
    • complaint(s);
    • declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.

    Authors’ responsibilities

    Stylesheet

    Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Armeniaca website.

    No multiple submissions

    Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other journals, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief. 

    Authorship

    Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.

    Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the article is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.

    The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.

    Conflicts of interest and financing

    Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the article stems from. 

    Quotations

    Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation. 

    Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.

    Ethical Committee

    Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 

    Emendations

    When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own article, they must immediately warn the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments. 

    Reviewers’ responsibilities

    Goal

    By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the articles submitted. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission. 

    Timing and conflicts of interest

    If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Armeniaca Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept articles for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified). 

    Confidentiality

    The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.

    Collaborative attitude

    Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”. 

    Plagiarism

    Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.