The Venice Journal of Environmental Humanities
Aims & Scope

Lagoonscapes. The Venice Journal of Environmental Humanities is a digital, open-access, international, and trans-disciplinary journal based at The New Institute Center for Environmental Humanities of Ca’ Foscari University in Venice. Lagoonscapes welcomes submissions from all the core disciplines of the Environmental Humanities, including literary and media studies, critical theory, visual arts, environmental and cultural history, political theory, and anthropology. Contributions are subject to a double-blind peer review process and are published by Edizioni Ca’ Foscari. The journal aims to promote a cross-disciplinary dialogue on contemporary and historical environmental issues, investigating relationships with non-human forms of life and the natural world from decolonial, feminist, and activist perspectives. Venice and its lagoon are a privileged location for sensing and interrogating the effects of human activity and climate change regarding the biological, cultural, and social dynamics of local ecosystems. The journal is associated with the pioneering Master in Environmental Humanities offered by Ca’ Foscari University and it aspires to become an international platform for scholars, artists, and activists to engage with the growing field of the Environmental Humanities.

General info

  • peopleBoards
    Stefano Beggiora, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Serenella Iovino, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA    

    Managing editor
    Alessandra Viola  

    Editorial board
    Daniele Brombal, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Valentina Bonifacio, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Giovanni Bulian, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    David Gentilcore, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Pietro Daniel Omodeo, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Fabio Pranovi, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Roberta Raffaetà, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Francesca Tarocco, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Federica Maria Giovanna Timeto, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Francesco Vacchiano, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Francesco Vallerani, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Massimo Warglien, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

    Advisory Board
    Joni Adamson, Arizona State University, USA    
    Marco Armiero, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm; CNR-ISMed    
    Shaul Bassi, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Gaetano Capizzi, Cinemabiente    
    Anna Greenspan, NYU Shangai, China    
    Philip Hayward, University of Technology Sydney, Australia    
    Federico Luisetti, Universität St. Gallen, Schweiz    
    Timo Maran, University of Tartu, Estonia    
    Christof Mauch, Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society, München, Deutschland    
    Bénédicte Meillon, Université de Perpignan “Via Domitia”, France    
    Ruth Mostern, University of Pittsburgh, USA    
    Serpil Oppermann, Cappadocia University, Turkey    
    Dimitris Papadopoulos, University of Nottingham, UK    
    Elena Past, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA    
    John Pickles, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA    
    Kate Rigby, Universität zu Köln, Deutschland    
    Scott Slovic, University of Idaho, USA    
    Jonathan Soffer, New York University Tandon School of Engineering, USA    
    Heather Sullivan, Trinity University, USA    
    Thom van Dooren, University of Sidney, Australia    
    Enrico Vicenti, UNESCO    
    Molly Westling, University of Oregon, USA    
    Hubert Zapf, Universität Augsburg, Deutschland    

Proposal / Submission

Use the form to submit a proposal.

mode_edit FORM


The article processing charges are regulated by the Publisher. For more information please visit: Publish with us.

Peer review

Every article published by ECF was accepted for publication by no less than two qualified reviewers as a result of a process of anonymous reviewing (double-blind peer review). The reviewers are independent of the authors and not affiliated with the same institution.

The Journal’s Editor-in-Chief guarantees the proper execution of the peer review process for every article published in the Journal.

Peer review policies for the different sections:

  • Complete volume/issue: subject to peer review
  • Monographs/essays/articles: subject to peer review
  • Introductions, prefaces: no peer review
  • Reviews: no peer review
  • Editorials: no peer review
For a complete description of the process, please visit: Scientific certification.

Editorial Guidelines
  • listEditorial Guidelines

    To be published all manuscripts must comply with the following guidelines. In case of blatant violation of the guidelines, the editor (ECF) can suspend at any time the manuscript’s publication.

    The instructions for the preparation of your manuscript, its abstract and its bibliography, are an integral part of the requirements for the manuscript submission. They are downloadable from the menu ‘Publish with us’ at the item ‘Editorial Guidelines’.

    • Manuscript Preparation
    • Document Basic Structure
    • Document Composition
    • Source Citation System
    • General Bibliography

    To find out more, please contact Edizioni Ca’ Foscari’s editorial staff at

  • listCall for papers

    CALL FOR PAPERS: Lagoonscapes 3 | 1 | 2023

    Framing Environments in Russia: Critical Reflections on Ecology, Culture and Power

    Guest editors: Nadia Caprioglio, Roberta Sala (University of Turin)

    Deadline for submissions: March 31, 2023

    Over the last decades, the attention to environmental issues has seen an increasing growth, with many analytical studies from intellectuals and researchers around the globe. In particular, the ecocritical theory, with its intriguing approaches and essential ideas, has spawned a distinct area of diverse critical perspectives, exhibiting a dynamic, fast-growing development, from deep ecology to ecofeminism and social ecology, to material ecocriticism. Its privileged position is unlikely to change during an epoch marked by a multitude of conflicts, ecological questions, predicaments and social issues.

    Russian scholarship in this field of studies has been particularly lacking, approaching nature mainly as a representational lens, or as a backdrop to more important “social” events. Nevertheless, the theme of nature occupies an important place in Russian literature and literary criticism, to the extent that the symbolism linked with some specific elements of Russian landscape (the forest, the river, the soil, etc.) has contributed to the shaping of Russian cultural identity. Despite this, environment in literature has mostly been related to the genre of nature writing, showing a deep connection with the idealistic view of landscape as a symbol of Russian traditions and Orthodox values.

    In the early days of the Soviet Union, however, a nascent public ecological consciousness allowed for the development of environmental conservation laws as early as 1928. Just a decade later, geologist Vladimir Vernadsky would popularize the concept of the noosphere in the field of natural science. Indeed, in his seminal work Scientific Thought as a Planetary Phenomenon [Naučnaja žizn’ kak planetnoe javlenie] the researcher theorized the mutual relationship between human cognition and earth’s systems as a “sphere of reason”, providing the basis for the ecological discourse.

    Presently, in Russia the cumulative crises of anthropogenic climate change, the indigenous land and water threat, the military conflicts, the role of energy resources for the country’s sovereignty are directing attention to the material structures of power that shape human and non-human interaction with the environment.

    This has placed renewed importance on the environmental studies within Russian cultural space, highlighting new aspects of the relationship between nature, society and culture, as well as conceptualizing the consequent transformation of the role of nature from an object of human thought and action, to a more active participant in socio-political processes.

    The cluster aims to present a collection of papers by researchers of several disciplines on various aspects of the prevailing themes in ecocritical theory and ecological thought, in order to shed light on the current ecocritical concepts in Russia. At the same time, new ways of exploring the relationship between ecocritical theory/ecological thought and some fundamental notions such as “energy,” “ecology,” “epoch,” and “humanities” will be examined, in order to truly comprehend the context and realities of twenty-first century Russia.

    Possible topics may include (but are not limited to) the following:

    • Affective Ecocriticism
    • Animals and Literature
    • Anthropocene
    • Biocentrism/Ecocentrism
    • Bioregionalism
    • Dark Ecology
    • Digital Environmental Humanities
    • Disappearing/enduring landscapes
    • Ecological and cultural conflicts of the industrialization
    • Ecophobia
    • Ecogothic Literature
    • Energy Humanities
    • Environmental crisis
    • Environmental philosophy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Hyperobjects
    • Indigenous ecologies
    • Interdisciplinary approaches to disaster (“natural” and “[hu]manmade”)
    • Land relations and land ethics
    • Landscape and memory studies
    • Literary Ecocriticism
    • Material Ecocriticism
    • Medical Humanities
    • National identity in the Anthropocene
    • Postcolonial Ecocriticism
    • Posthuman Ecocriticism
    • Psychological Ecology
    • Waters and digs


    Abstract submission: September 26, 2022

    Article submission: March 31, 2023

    If you would like to participate, please submit your abstract (no more than 350 words) using the link below and attaching a short bio by September 15, 2022.

    We encourage proposals that emphasize expansive thinking about the topic from scholars at all stages of their careers.

    Articles must be written in English and should not exceed 6,000 words, including abstract and bibliography. The instructions for authors can be consulted in the journal’s website: ‘Editorial Guidelines’. Submissions must be suitable for blind review.

    Go to the upload area

  • listComplete journal policy

    Ethical Code of Lagoonscapes. The Venice Journal of Environmental Humanities

    Lagoonscapes. The Venice Journal of Environmental Humanities is a peer-reviewed scientific journal whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code. See the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

    Publisher’s responsibilities  

    The Publisher must provide the Journal with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.

    The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Journal and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.

    The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence. 

    Editors’ responsibilities 

    The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Lagoonscapes alone are responsible for the decision to publish the articles submitted.

    Submitted articles, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief.

    The Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Journalʼs policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors. 

    Allegations of misconduct

    If the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published article, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the article or publish a recantation.

    All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.

    Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail The letter should contain the following information:

    • complainant’s personal information;
    • title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
    • complaint(s);
    • declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.

    Authors’ responsibilities


    Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Lagoonscapes website.

    No multiple submissions

    Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other journals, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief. 


    Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.

    Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the article is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.

    The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.

    Conflicts of interest and financing

    Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the article stems from. 


    Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation. 

    Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.

    Ethical Committee

    Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 


    When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own article, they must immediately warn the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments. 

    Reviewers’ responsibilities


    By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the articles submitted. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission. 

    Timing and conflicts of interest

    If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Lagoonscapes Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept articles for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified). 


    The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.

    Collaborative attitude

    Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”. 


    Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.