Section 2. Pietro Antonio Michiel’s Garden and the Litigiousness of

« previous chapter | next chapter »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_18117
dc.title	Section 2. Pietro Antonio Michiel’s Garden and the Litigiousness of Protobotanists
dc.type	Chapter
dc.language.iso	it
dc.description.abstract	Amongst sixteenth-century Venetian gardens, that of the nobleman Pietro Antonio Michiel (1510-1576), in San Trovaso (Dorsoduro), was one of the most beautiful and one of the richest in botanical varieties. A shy and passionate student of nature, Michiel often went gathering herbs in the territories of the Serenissima, while diplomats and traveller friends brought to his home in San Trovaso rare plants from the New World, Northern Europe and the Far East. In order to study their growth and developments through the seasons, Pietro Antonio often tried to plant them in his own garden. Though this garden no longer exists, the herbarium he assembled throughout his life remains: in it he recorded the characteristics and medicinal properties of 1,028 plants, and had them depicted by painters of varying abilities. Though he was not a physician or a naturalist by profession, Michiel maintained good relations with the leading figures in botanical research of his time. However, even his illustrated herbarium shows the highly competitive atmosphere that surrounded medical professionals. Materia medica touched on issues of life and death: researchers sought to correctly identify the plants described in ancient texts – which often lacked images and had been corrupted along the way – and to discover new medicinal plants that could cure the sick body or, on the contrary, those that might be harmful to health. Such research could bring lustre and fame, but also blame and ridicule.
dc.relation.ispartof	Disclosing Collections
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Venice University Press, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.issued	2023-07-26
dc.dateSubmitted	2023-03-22
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-720-3/sezione-2-il-giardino-di-pietro-antonio-michiel-e/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-719-7/002
dc.identifier.issn	2974-5276
dc.identifier.eissn	2974-5748
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-720-3
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-719-7
dc.rights	Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	yes

Chapter
open access peer reviewed

Section 2. Pietro Antonio Michiel’s Garden and the Litigiousness of Protobotanists

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Amongst sixteenth-century Venetian gardens, that of the nobleman Pietro Antonio Michiel (1510-1576), in San Trovaso (Dorsoduro), was one of the most beautiful and one of the richest in botanical varieties. A shy and passionate student of nature, Michiel often went gathering herbs in the territories of the Serenissima, while diplomats and traveller friends brought to his home in San Trovaso rare plants from the New World, Northern Europe and the Far East. In order to study their growth and developments through the seasons, Pietro Antonio often tried to plant them in his own garden. Though this garden no longer exists, the herbarium he assembled throughout his life remains: in it he recorded the characteristics and medicinal properties of 1,028 plants, and had them depicted by painters of varying abilities. Though he was not a physician or a naturalist by profession, Michiel maintained good relations with the leading figures in botanical research of his time. However, even his illustrated herbarium shows the highly competitive atmosphere that surrounded medical professionals. Materia medica touched on issues of life and death: researchers sought to correctly identify the plants described in ancient texts – which often lacked images and had been corrupted along the way – and to discover new medicinal plants that could cure the sick body or, on the contrary, those that might be harmful to health. Such research could bring lustre and fame, but also blame and ridicule.

Published

July 26, 2023

Submitted

March 22, 2023

Language

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-720-3

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-719-7

permalink: http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-719-7/002

Copyright: © 2023 This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted in unadapted form only and provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. You may not use the material for commercial purposes. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite