Series |
Quaderni di Venezia Arti
Volume 6 | Edited book | Space Oddity: Exercises in Art and Philosophy
Abstract
The volume includes papers presented at the 4th Postgraduate International Conference of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Heritage of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice (Venice, 5-7 October 2022). Our understanding of reality is filtered through myriad media, and we have the ability – and power – to gather, ignore, tweak, and explore the information needed to define what we mean by ‘reality’. The concept of ‘space’ – in its broadest sense – plays an essential role in an individual’s explanation of reality, and we must deal with a plurality of models and concepts of it. As elaborated in the text Space and Time in Art, the Russian theologian, philosopher, and art theorist Pavel Florensky states: “all culture can be interpreted as the activity of organising space”. Starting from this culturological reading, Florensky identifies three spatial “dimensions” and three corresponding genres of activity: (1) The space of our strong relations and the activity of ‘Technique’; (2) The mental space and its organisation and the activities of ‘Science’ or ‘Philosophy’; (3) The space between the previous two, and the activity of ‘Art’. Ultimately, all have the same aim: to change reality to reconstruct space. According to leading scholars and critics, the late 1980s saw a “spatial turn” take place in literary, social, and cultural studies. In 1991 Fredric Jameson theorised a shift from the paradigm of time to the paradigm of space, from modernism to postmodernism. The pandemic era has refocused investigation on the present paradigm, where Florensky’s spaces have been concentrated through cyberspace almost overnight. Through the notion of the ‘semiosphere’ – as elaborated by Juri Lotman 100 years ago – we collectively pondered the question: “should we reconsider the concept of space as a cultural category altogether?”.
Keywords Fyodor Stravinsky • Organism • Visibility • Ontology • Consumption • Early Modern Age • Technology • Louis Marin • Analogue photography • Ancient Stoicism • Drawing • Hauntology • Philosophy • Nefs • Ethnomusicology • Artist • Igor Stravinsky • Inflatables • Space • John of the Cross • Folklore • Incorporeals • Altar • Dance • Photography • Cultural decolonialism • Modernity • Heidegger • Archival spaces • Absence • Architecture representations • Martha Rosler • Visual identity • Museum • Hypercomfort • Transición • Bird’s-eye View • Coloniality • Art history • Opacity • Place • Knapping • Historiography • Stravinsky’s family • Eline Mugaas • Displaying • History of art • Visual semiotics • Exhibition theory • Skill • Home • Non-human • Art • National image • Kustar • Architectural design • Room • Architecture curation • Communal apartments • Mies van der Rohe • Dwelling • Digital archives • Venice Biennale • Transparency • Material culture • Performance installation • Ephemeral architecture • Visual culture • Hudinilson Jr • Cultural space • Public space • Topology • Landscape • The Tupikov House • Scrapbook • Archival turn • Field • Architecture • Musical repatriation • Ritual • Audience • National Pavilion • Russian style • Chile • Conflagration • Enunciation • Blind man’s stick • Sound and audiovisual archives • Architecture exhibition • Image Theory • Malafouris • Isa Genzken • Power • Presence • Scrapbooking • Kommunalka • Biennial Art • Void • Ephemera • Body • Arts and crafts • Crucifixion • Ship models • Krzysztof Wodiczko • Cultural discourse • Late Middle Ages • Conspicuous • Curatorial theory • Visual studies • Elise Storsveen • Orbit
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-675-6 | e-ISBN 978-88-6969-675-6 | Published Dec. 21, 2022 | Language en
Copyright © 2022 Giulia Gelmi, Anastasia Kozachenko-Stravinsky, Andrea Nalesso. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Display Tools: From Theory to Practice
Juggling the Presence, Revealing the Concepts
Cultural Crossroads: In Search of a Common Ground
Social Dynamics’ Insight: Questioning Power and Community
Permeable Boundaries: Materiality vs Immateriality
Representation as Trace of Enunciation
Building Narratives, Imagining Realities