Series |
Antiquity Studies
Edited book | ΦΑΙΔΙΜΟΣ ΕΚΤΩΡ
Chapter | Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus
Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus
- Bruno Currie - University of Oxford, UK - email
Abstract
This paper discusses the suspected reading †ἀïδνῆς in Hes. Theog. 860 and proposes the emendation οὔρεος ἐν βήσσῃς, <ε>ἰν Αἴτνῃ παιπαλοέσσῃ. The interpretative consequences of thus introducing into the text a reference to Mount Etna are then explored. The immediately following passage, ll. 861-867, is reinterpreted in the light of a preceding reference to the Sicilian volcano. Not only Hesiod, but also Homer is argued to have knowledge of volcanism. Hesiod’s simple, unelaborated reference to Typhoeus’ defeat at Mount Etna implies that the association of Typhoeus with Mount Etna was made by Greeks before Hesiod; it can plausibly be connected to Greek colonising or proto-colonising activity in the eighth century BCE. The Typhonomachy would be only one of several mythological episodes in early Greek hexameter poetry to be localised in the West. Finally, the arguable presence of the Typhoeus-Etna link in Hesiod’s Theogony significantly increases the likelihood that the closely related descriptions of Typhoeus in passages of Pindar (from Pyth. 1, Pyth. 8, Ol. 4, and frr. 92-3 Maehler) and the (Pseudo-)Aeschylean Prometheus Bound do not depend on each other, but on a lost early hexameter account of the Typhonomachy (perhaps, but not necessarily, the Cyclical Titanomachy) that had attained canonical status by the fifth century BCE. Thus also one popular argument for a late dating of the Prometheus Bound, and for its non-Aeschylean authorship, would need to be discarded.
Submitted: May 17, 2021 | Accepted: June 23, 2021 | Published Dec. 16, 2021 | Language: en
Keywords Volcanism • Pindar • The Greek West • Mount Etna • Prometheus Bound • Sicily • Typhonomachy • Hesiod
Copyright © 2021 Bruno Currie. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-548-3/004
In limine
-
Ogni epoca ha la sua guerra di Troia
Poesie neogreche, per Ettore - Caterina Carpinato
- Dec. 16, 2021
Poesia esametrica arcaica
- Retour sur l’hymne homérique comme proème : la pragmatique de l’hymne 6 à Aphrodite
- Claude Calame
- Dec. 16, 2021
- A Hesiodic Heldendämmerung: Some Textual Problems and Reconstructions
- Thomas Coward
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus
- Bruno Currie
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Note a frammenti esiodei
- Claudio Meliadò
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Pyrwias Leading the Dance
- David Sider
- Dec. 16, 2021
Lirica
- Theognis’ Unoriginal Didactic Failure
- Henry Spelman
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Fasce e prodigi. Pindaro e l'inno omerico a Hermes
- Maria Cannatà Fera
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Apollon Pythien chez Pindare
- Nadine Le Meur
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Notes on P.Oxy. XXXII 2636 (Commentary to Pindar?)
- Enrico Emanuele Prodi
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Osservazioni in margine a Pind. Pyth. 3.34-37
- Renzo Tosi
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Pind. fr. 321 Sn.-Maehl. delendum
- Stefano Vecchiato
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Bacchylides Playing Tragic
- Theodora A. Hadjimichael
- Dec. 16, 2021
- A Boeotian Poem in PSI X 1174: Some Considerations
- Giovan Battista D’Alessio, Lucia Prauscello
- Dec. 16, 2021
-
The Pocket Pindar
The Antinoupolis Codex and Pindar’s Readership in Graeco-Roman Egypt - Mark de Kreij
- Dec. 16, 2021
Tragedia
- Aesch. Eum. vv. 490-565: studio sull’epiploke e sulle variazioni metrico-ritmiche
- Liana Lomiento
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Fato e maledizione nell’Antigone di Sofocle
- Marco Dorati
- Dec. 16, 2021
Poesia ellenistica tarda
- P.Vindob. G 26768a: Non-Antimachean Thebaid (with Possible Associated Fragments from Other Collections)
- Marco Perale
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Socrates in Love (Herodicus Suppl. Hell. 495)
- Richard Hunter
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Athenaeus and Hellenistic Epigram
- Ewen Bowie
- Dec. 16, 2021
-
Δύνασαι πάλιν αὐτὸν ἐγεῖραι
Cristianizzazione del lessico funerario e del linguaggio epico nella risurrezione di Lazzaro (Cometa, Anth. Pal. 15.40) - Alice Franceschini
- Dec. 16, 2021
Prosa
-
A Forgotten Piece of the Theban Saga?
Reassessing Hec. fr. 33 EGM - Ilaria Andolfi
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Perieci di Cirene
- Stefania De Vido
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Una storia della musica e della lirica greca dalle origini al IV secolo a.C. nel De musica attribuito a Plutarco
- Antonietta Gostoli
- Dec. 16, 2021
- À l’arrivée de Molon : sur un calembour mécompris chez Strabon (14.2.13 C655)
- Aude Cohen-Skalli
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Rewriting Homer: Dictys, Septimius and the (Re-)shaping of the Trojan War Material
- Sara Kaczko
- Dec. 16, 2021
Poesia latina
- A Night in Cyprus (Verg. Aen. 1.657-697)
- Alessandro Barchiesi
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Ovid and the Ass (Fast. 1.391-440, 6.319-46)
- Myrto Garani
- Dec. 16, 2021
- L’epitafio di Platone Hic iacet ille Plato… (CLE 1395 = ICVRII 442, n. 152)
- Paolo Mastandrea
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Un cavallo nell’Elisio (Auson. Epigr. 7 Green)
- Luca Mondin
- Dec. 16, 2021
Linguistica e storia degli studi
- Il cerilo di Alcmane tra Aristofane, Antigono, Eufronio e Didimo
- Federica Benuzzi
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Paris’ μαχλοσύνη, a Mistranslated Aeschylean Fragment, and the Meanings of μάχλος (Hom. Il. 24.30, Aesch. fr. 325 Radt)
- Albio Cassio
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Forgotten Scholarship: Gustav Adolf Schöll, Herodotus, and Greek Oracular Poetry
- Maurizio Giangiulio
- Dec. 16, 2021
- Solo una cantina buia? Alcune riflessioni sulla magia
- Giulio Guidorizzi
- Dec. 16, 2021
-
ἀφθόνητος αἶνος
Su tre lemmi pindarici dell’Antiatticista - Olga Tribulato
- Dec. 16, 2021
A mo’ di conclusione
- The Sublime in Motion: Longinus, Freud, and Embedded Metaphors
- Alessandro Schiesaro
- Dec. 16, 2021
| DC Field | Value |
|---|---|
|
dc.identifier |
ECF_chapter_6524 |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Currie Bruno |
|
dc.title |
Typhoeus and Etna in Hesiod, Pindar, and (Pseudo-)Aeschylus |
|
dc.type |
Chapter |
|
dc.language.iso |
en |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper discusses the suspected reading †ἀïδνῆς in Hes. Theog. 860 and proposes the emendation οὔρεος ἐν βήσσῃς, <ε>ἰν Αἴτνῃ παιπαλοέσσῃ. The interpretative consequences of thus introducing into the text a reference to Mount Etna are then explored. The immediately following passage, ll. 861-867, is reinterpreted in the light of a preceding reference to the Sicilian volcano. Not only Hesiod, but also Homer is argued to have knowledge of volcanism. Hesiod’s simple, unelaborated reference to Typhoeus’ defeat at Mount Etna implies that the association of Typhoeus with Mount Etna was made by Greeks before Hesiod; it can plausibly be connected to Greek colonising or proto-colonising activity in the eighth century BCE. The Typhonomachy would be only one of several mythological episodes in early Greek hexameter poetry to be localised in the West. Finally, the arguable presence of the Typhoeus-Etna link in Hesiod’s Theogony significantly increases the likelihood that the closely related descriptions of Typhoeus in passages of Pindar (from Pyth. 1, Pyth. 8, Ol. 4, and frr. 92-3 Maehler) and the (Pseudo-)Aeschylean Prometheus Bound do not depend on each other, but on a lost early hexameter account of the Typhonomachy (perhaps, but not necessarily, the Cyclical Titanomachy) that had attained canonical status by the fifth century BCE. Thus also one popular argument for a late dating of the Prometheus Bound, and for its non-Aeschylean authorship, would need to be discarded. |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Antiquity Studies |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Filologia e letteratura |
|
dc.publisher |
Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari |
|
dc.issued |
2021-12-16 |
|
dc.dateAccepted |
2021-06-23 |
|
dc.dateSubmitted |
2021-05-17 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-549-0/typhoeus-and-etna-in-hesiod-pindar-and-pseudo-aesc/ |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.30687/978-88-6969-548-3/004 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2610-8828 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2610-9344 |
|
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-88-6969-549-0 |
|
dc.identifier.eisbn |
978-88-6969-548-3 |
|
dc.rights |
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License |
|
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|
item.fulltext |
with fulltext |
|
item.grantfulltext |
open |
|
dc.peer-review |
no |
|
dc.subject |
Hesiod |
|
dc.subject |
Hesiod |
|
dc.subject |
Mount Etna |
|
dc.subject |
Mount Etna |
|
dc.subject |
Pindar |
|
dc.subject |
Pindar |
|
dc.subject |
Prometheus Bound |
|
dc.subject |
Prometheus Bound |
|
dc.subject |
Sicily |
|
dc.subject |
Sicily |
|
dc.subject |
The Greek West |
|
dc.subject |
The Greek West |
|
dc.subject |
Typhonomachy |
|
dc.subject |
Typhonomachy |
|
dc.subject |
Volcanism |
|
dc.subject |
Volcanism |
| Download data |