Lexis Supplements

Lexis Studies in Greek and Latin Literature | Lexis Ancient Philosophy | Lexis Sources, Texts and Commentaries
     topic: antiquity studies  
Aims & Scope

The series mainly includes original studies devoted to classical literature and the classical heritage in the medieval and modern literary civilization, as well as collections of writings by philologists of recognized international value. It is also open to philosophical and historical studies with a strong focus on textual sources.


General info

  • peopleBoards
    Editors-in-Chief of the subseries Lexis Studies in Greek and Latin Literature
    Paolo Mastandrea, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Enrico Medda, Università di Pisa, Italia    
    Martina Venuti, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

    Editors-in-Chief of the subseries Lexis Ancient Philosophy
    Carlos Lévy, Université Paris-Sorbonne, Paris IV, France    
    Stefano Maso, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

    Advisory board of the subseries Lexis Studies in Greek and Latin Literature
    Giuseppina Basta Donzelli, già Università degli Studi di Catania, Italia    
    Luigi Battezzato, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Italia    
    Riccardo Di Donato, già Università di Pisa, Italia    
    Paolo Eleuteri, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Michel Fartzoff, Université de Franche-Comté, France    
    Alessandro Fusi, Università della Tuscia, Italia    
    Massimo Gioseffi, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italia    
    Liana Lomiento, Università degli Studi di Urbino Carlo Bo, Italia    
    Giuseppina Magnaldi, già Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia    
    Silvia Mattiacci, Università degli Studi di Siena, Italia    
    Giuseppe Mastromarco, già Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Italia    
    Raffaele Perrelli, Università della Calabria, Cosenza, Italia    

    Advisory board of the subseries Lexis Ancient Philosophy
    Douglas Cairns, University of Edinburgh, UK    
    Walter Cavini, Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Italia    
    Elisabetta Cattanei, Università di Genova, Italia    
    Michel Fattal, Université Grenoble Alpes, France  
    Alain Gigandet, Université Paris-Est, France    
    Fritz-Gregor Herrmann, Swansea University, UK    
    Pierre-Marie Morel, Université Paris I – Sorbonne, France    
    Phillip Mitsis, New York University, USA    
    Carlo Natali, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Monte Ransome Johnson, University of California, San Diego, USA    
    Gretchen Reydams Schils, Notre Dame University, USA    
    Emidio Spinelli, Sapienza Università di Roma, Italia    
    Jula Wildberger, American University of Paris, France  
    Marco Zingano, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil    

    Editorial board
    Federico Boschetti, ILC-CNR, Pisa; VeDPH, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Laura Carrara, Università di Pisa, Italia    
    Carmela Cioffi, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Massimo Manca, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italia    
    Valeria Melis, Università degli Studi di Cagliari; Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Luca Mondin, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Stefano Novelli, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Italia    
    Leyla Ozbek, Ricercatrice indipendente    
    Giovanna Pace, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Italia    
    Antonio Pistellato, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    
    Paolo Scattolin, Università di Verona, Italia    
    Matteo Taufer, Ricercatore indipendente    
    Olga Tribulato, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia    

Proposal / Submission

Use the form to submit a proposal.

mode_edit FORM

Head office
Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici
Palazzo Malcanton Marcorà
Dorsoduro 3484/D
30123 Venezia

The article processing charges are regulated by the Publisher. For more information please visit: Publish with us.

Peer review

The Scientific Direction of the series is responsible for the selection of the reviewers and the type of peer review on the basis of the specific features of the proposed volume. The series applies three types of peer review: double blind peer review, open peer review, and a mixed review in which one of the two reviewers is a member of the Advisory Board or the Scientific Direction and the other is external and ‘blind’ (the reviewer is unaware of the identity of the author and the author is unaware of the identity of the reviewer).

The reviewers are independent of the authors and not affiliated with the same institution.

The Series’ Editor-in-Chief guarantees the proper execution of the peer review process for every book published in the Series.

Peer review policies for the different sections:

  • Complete volume/issue: subject to peer review
  • Monographs/essays/articles: subject to peer review
  • Introductions, prefaces: no peer review
  • Reviews: no peer review
  • Editorials: no peer review
For a complete description of the process, please visit: Scientific certification.

Our series and journals are archived on PHAIDRA (Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets), a platform for long-term archiving of digital collections: PHAIDRA.
Editorial Guidelines
  • listEditorial Guidelines


    Texts that will be uploaded to the portal for the peer review process must be strictly anonymous: any element contained in the body of the text or in the notes must not allow the reviewer to identify the author (remember to delete your name from the 'author' entry in the file properties).

    Each text must be accompanied by five (5) keywords and an abstract in English of a maximum length of 700 characters including spaces.

    Footnotes: footnotes only. Cite according to the Anglo-Saxon ‘Name-Year’ system (see below).

    Greek font: a Unicode font must be used.

    Verse and page numbers must be abbreviated: e.g. 345-7

    Modern authors: in the text, first names consistently in abbreviated form: e.g. S. Panciera, P. Mastandrea. No spaces between abbreviated double names: e.g. M.L. West and not M. L. West. For internal references use citation on the Anglo-Saxon model, with abbreviated numbers (Name-Year: e.g. Wilamowitz 1914, 115-26).


    The basic character is the Roman.

    Latin phrases in the text go in italics (including words such as infra and supra) except in cases of a quotation from a modern work where the text goes in the round between the double quotation marks (“ ”).

    Foreign words in their original spelling that have not entered into common usage go in italics: e.g. Leitmotiv, Wortstellung.

    Phrases in Greek characters never go in italics.

    Common abbreviations:

    • Compare: cf.
    • Following(s): f./ff.
    • Appendix: app.
    • Article: art.
    • Chapter: chap.
    • Column(s): c./cc.
    • Eccetera: etc.
    • Publisher(s): ed./edd.
    • Edition(s): ed./edd.
    • Example: ex.
    • Exempli gratia: e.g.
    • Line(s): l./ll.
    • Cited place(s): l.c./ll.cc.
    • Manuscript(s): MS/MSS
    • Footnote: fn.
    • Number(s): no./nos.
    • Paragraph: par. [however, use the conventional sign § if possible].
    • Scholium ad locum: schol. ad l.
    • Scholium ad locum laudatum: schol. l.c.
    • Sezione/i: sez./sezz.
    • Sub voce/ibus: s.v./s.vv.
    • Supplement: suppl.
    • Table(s): tab./tabs
    • Translation: transl.
    • Varia/e lectio/nes: v.l./vv.ll.
    • Verse(s): v./vv.
    • Volume(s): vol./vols.

    For works, manuals, dictionaries, encyclopaedias, widely consulted instruments, use abbreviated quotations in italics: e.g. RE, GH, ThlL, LSJ.

    Ancient authors

    • within a quotation use a full stop: Hor. carm. 1.2.4.
    • between quotations of the same author use comma and space: Ov. ars 1.27, 3.48, met. 10.149-51, 158
    • between quotations by different authors use semicolon: Verg. Aen. 3.250, 446; Hor. carm. 1.2, 4, 1.4.1, 27.

    The citations follow the abbreviations given by ThlL for Latin (e.g. Hor. ars and not Ars) and by LSJ for Greek (see exceptions in the section below).

    Abbreviations in derogation of LSJ:

    Aesch. not A. → Aesch. Suppl. Sept. Pers. PV Ag. Ch. Eum.

    Soph. not S. → Soph. Ai. El. OT Ant. Tr. Phil. OC

    Eur. not E. → Eur. Cycl. Alc. Med. Her . Hipp. Andr . Hec. Suppl. HF Ion Tro. IT El. Hel. Pho. Or. Ba. IA Rh.

    Aristoph. not Ar. → Aristoph. Ach. Eq. Nub. Vesp. Av. Pax Lys. Thesm. Ran. Eccl. Pl.

    Bacch. not B.

    Dem. not D.

    Pind. not Pi. → Pind. Pyth. Ol. Isth. Nem.

    Thuc. not Th.

    Xen. not X.


    Italics used: P. Oxy.


    Journal names should be italicised; they should not be put in inverted commas. The abbreviations of the Année Philologique are generally adopted. Names of journals not included in the Année Philologique should be written in full.



    Parker, R. (1983). Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Radt, S.L. (1977). Tragicorum Graecorum fragmenta. Vol. 4, Sophocles. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.

    Krumeich, R.; Pechstein, N.; Seidensticker, B. (Hrsgg) (1999). Das griechischen Satyrspiel. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Journal articles:

    Boardman, J. (1975). «Herakles, Peisistratos and Eleusis». JHS, 95, 1-12.

    Armstrong, D.; Hanson, A.E. (1987). «The Virgin’s Voice and Neck. Aeschylus, Agamemnon 245 and Other Texts». BICS, 33, 97-100.

    Volume chapters:

    Harvey, D. (2005). «Tragic Thrausmatology: The Study of the Fragments of Greek Tragedy in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries». McHardy, F.; Robson, J.; Harvey, D. (eds), Lost Dramas of Classical Athens: Greek Tragic Fragments. Exeter: Liverpool University Press, 328-61.

    Bibliographic abbreviations ‘Name year’ will be used in the notes, according to these examples:

    Parker 1983, 254-7; Harvey 2005, 328; Krumeich, Pechstein, Seidensticker 1999, 25-30.

    For a complete list of editorial standards, please visit ‘Editorial Guidelines’.

  • listPolicy

    Ethical Code of Lexis Supplements

    Lexis Supplements is a peer-reviewed scientific book series whose policy is inspired by the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) Ethical Code.

    Publisher’s responsibilities  

    The Publisher must provide the Book Series with adequate resources and the guidance of experts, in order to carry out its role in the most professional way, aiming at the highest quality standard.

    The Publisher must have a written agreement that defines the relationship with the owner of the Book Series and/or the Editor-in-Chief. The agreement must comply with the Code of Behavior for Publishers of Scientific Journals, as established by COPE.

    The relationship among the Editor-in-Chief, the Advisory Board and the Publisher is based on the principle of publishing independence. 

    Editors’ responsibilities 

    The Editor-in-Chief and the Advisory Board of Lexis Supplements alone are responsible for the decision to publish the submitted works.

    Submitted works, after having been checked for plagiarism by means of the anti-plagiarism software Compilatio that is used by the University and is made available to us, will be sent to at least two reviewers. Final acceptance presumes the implementation of possible amendments, as required by the reviewers and under the supervision of the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief.

    The Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board must evaluate each submitted paper in compliance with the Book Seriesʼ policy, i.e. exclusively on the basis of its scientific content, without discrimination of race, sex, gender, creed, ethnic origin, citizenship, or the scientific, academic and political position of the Authors. 

    Allegations of misconduct

    If the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board notice (or receive notifications of) mistakes or inaccuracies, conflict of interest or plagiarism in a published book, they will immediately warn the Author and the Publisher and will undertake the necessary actions to resolve the issue. They will do their best to correct the published content whenever they are informed that it contains scientific errors or that the authors have committed unethical or illegal acts in connection with their published work. If necessary, they will withdraw the book or publish a recantation.

    All complaints are handled in accordance with the guidelines published by the COPE.

    Concerns and complaints must be addressed to the following e-mail ecf_support@unive.it. The letter should contain the following information:

    • complainant’s personal information;
    • title, author(s), publication date, DOI;
    • complaint(s);
    • declaration that the complainant has no conflict of interest, or declaration of an actual or potential conflict of interest.

    Authors’ responsibilities


    Authors must follow the Guidelines for Authors to be downloaded from the Lexis Supplements website.

    No multiple submissions

    Authors must explicitly state that their work is original in all its parts and that the submitted paper has not been previously published, nor submitted to other publishers, until the entire evaluation process is completed. Since no paper or book gets published without significant revision, earlier dissemination in conference proceedings or working papers does not preclude consideration for publication, but Authors are expected to fully disclose publication/dissemination of the material in other closely related publications, so that the overlap can be evaluated by the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief. 


    Authors are strongly encouraged to use their ORCID iD when submitting a manuscript. This will ensure the authors’ visibility and correct citation of their work.

    Authorship must be correctly attributed; all those who have given a substantial contribution to the design, organisation and accomplishment of the research the book is based on, must be indicated as Co-Authors. Please ensure that: the order of the author names is correct; the names of all authors are present and correctly spelled, and that affiliations are up-to-date.

    The respective roles of each co-author should be described in a footnote. The statement that all authors have approved the final version should be included in the disclosure.

    Conflicts of interest and financing

    Authors, under their own responsibility, must avoid any conflict of interest affecting the results obtained or the interpretations suggested. The Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief will give serious and careful consideration to suggestions of cases in which, due to possible conflict of interest, an Author’s work should not be reviewed by a specific scholar. Authors should indicate any financing agency or the project the book stems from. 


    Authors must see to it that all works consulted be properly quoted. If works or words of others are used, they have to be properly paraphrased or duly quoted. Quotations between “double quotes” (or «angled quotation marks» if the text is written in a language other than English) must reproduce the exact wording of the source; under their own responsibility, Authors should carefully refrain from disguising a restyling of the source’s wording, as though it was the original formulation. 

    Any form of excessive, inappropriate or unnecessary self-citation, as well as any other form of citation manipulation, are strongly discouraged.

    Ethical Committee

    Whenever required, the research protocols must be authorised in advance by the Ethical Committee of Ca’ Foscari University of Venice. 


    When Authors find a mistake or an inaccuracy in their own work, they must immediately warn the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief, providing all the information needed to make the due adjustments. 

    Reviewers’ responsibilities


    By means of the peer-review procedure, reviewers assist the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief and Advisory Board in taking decisions on the submitted works. They are expected to offer the Authors suggestions as to possible adjustments aimed at improving their contribution submission. 

    Timing and conflicts of interest

    If a reviewer does not feel up to the task of doing a given review, or if she/he is unable to read the work within the agreed schedule, she/he should notify the Lexis Supplements Editor-in-Chief. Reviewers must not accept texts for which there is a conflict of interest due to previous contributions or to a competition with a disclosed author (or with an author they believe to have identified). 


    The content of the reviewed work must be considered confidential and must not be used without explicit authorisation by the Author, who is to be contacted via the editor-in-chief. Any confidential information obtained during the peer review process should not be used for other purposes.

    Collaborative attitude

    Reviewers should see themselves not as adversaries but as advocates for the field. Any comment must be done in a collaborative way and from an objective point of view. Reviewers should clearly motivate their comments and keep in mind the Golden Rule of Reviewing: “Review for others as you would have others review for you”. 


    Reviewers should report any similarity or overlapping of the work under analysis with other works known to them.