Journal | JoLMA
Journal issue | 4 | 2 | 2023
The philosophical reflection stemming from actual scientific practice has been proven to have the potential to inform ethical thinking and political practice with a more robust foundation than those not necessarily linked to scientific developments. This is not, of course, to argue for an alleged preeminence of science over speculative philosophical reflection, nor that scientific practices should remain untouched by science-informed philosophy. On the contrary, history and anthropology of science function as antidotes to similar unfounded views. Recent scientific and technological discoveries require a stronger role for philosophy in public and institutional discussions. Their practical consequences for humans and non-humans cannot be ignored.
Keywords Enactivism • Basal cognition • Ontological Turn • Posthumanism • Biopsychism • Animal cognition • Philosophy of Mind • Unification • Gut-brain axis • Anthropomorphism • Biogenic approach • Social struggles • Generativity • Plant cognition • Mind • New materialism • Animal ethics • Extending cognition • Concepts • Computation • Memory • Microbiome • Metaphilosophy • Cybernetics • Cognitive ontology • Pluralism • Evolution of cognition • Plant Cognition • Holism • Unconventional Cognitive System • Zoopsychism • Self • Climate justice • Environmental ethics • Posthuman • Cognition • Multispecies justice • Relational Value
Permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Jolma/2723-9640/2023/02 | Published Dec. 20, 2023 | Language en
Copyright © Filippo Batisti. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.