Institutional Change for Gender Equality in Research

« previous volume | next volume »

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_book_381
dc.creator	Sangiuliano Maria
dc.creator	Cortesi Agostino
dc.title	Institutional Change for Gender Equality in Research. Lesson Learned from the Field
dc.type	Edited book
dc.language.iso	en
dc.description.abstract	Gender balance in research organizations is considered as a key step for ensuring research excellence and quality and inclusive-sustainable innovation. Still, in spite of an increasing number of HE and research institutions committed to make science more equal and some positive trends in figures on Gender equality in STEM research, it still appears to be difficult to prioritize gender equality. This is particularly true for disciplines such as ICT/IST where female representation at all levels is among the lowest ones among STEM topics and where a gender sensitive approach to ICT design and programming is far from being understood in its implications among computer and information systems scientist. H2020 (PGERI and SWAFS programmes in particular), promoted the concept of institutional change for gender equality, insisting on the need for merging change management and gender policies. The volume is focusing on a presentation and reflexive review of results and tools from the H2020 EQUAL-IST project to discuss opportunities to innovate and transform HR management and Institutional communication, research design, teaching & students services, via gender equality, and how such innovations could be multiplied and sustained with a focus on ICT and IST research organizations. The volume is complemented by contributions from other projects on institutional change in research.
dc.relation.ispartof	Scienza e società
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-334-2
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing
dc.issued	2019-12-17
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-335-9/
dc.identifier.issn	0
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-335-9
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-334-2
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	no
dc.subject	Academia
dc.subject	Academia
dc.subject	Academia
dc.subject	Boards of directors
dc.subject	Boards of directors
dc.subject	Boards of directors
dc.subject	Co-design
dc.subject	Co-design
dc.subject	Co-design
dc.subject	Cohalition building
dc.subject	Cohalition building
dc.subject	Cohalition building
dc.subject	Context sensitive monitoring
dc.subject	Context sensitive monitoring
dc.subject	Context sensitive monitoring
dc.subject	Control bodies
dc.subject	Control bodies
dc.subject	Control bodies
dc.subject	Crowdsourcing
dc.subject	Crowdsourcing
dc.subject	Crowdsourcing
dc.subject	Diversity
dc.subject	Diversity
dc.subject	Diversity
dc.subject	Engineering
dc.subject	Engineering
dc.subject	Engineering
dc.subject	Equality
dc.subject	Equality
dc.subject	Equality
dc.subject	Gender
dc.subject	Gender
dc.subject	Gender
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plan
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plan
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plan
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plan
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plan
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPS)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPS)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPS)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPs)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPs)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPs)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPs)
dc.subject	Gender Equality Plans (GEPs)
dc.subject	Gender Gap
dc.subject	Gender Gap
dc.subject	Gender Gap
dc.subject	Gender audits
dc.subject	Gender audits
dc.subject	Gender audits
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality
dc.subject	Gender equality in ICT/IST research institutions
dc.subject	Gender equality in ICT/IST research institutions
dc.subject	Gender equality in ICT/IST research institutions
dc.subject	Gender equality in research
dc.subject	Gender equality in research
dc.subject	Gender equality in research
dc.subject	Gender equality plans
dc.subject	Gender equality plans
dc.subject	Gender equality plans
dc.subject	Gender segregation
dc.subject	Gender segregation
dc.subject	Gender segregation
dc.subject	Gender stereotypes
dc.subject	Gender stereotypes
dc.subject	Gender stereotypes
dc.subject	ICT Summer Camp
dc.subject	ICT Summer Camp
dc.subject	ICT Summer Camp
dc.subject	IST research organizations
dc.subject	IST research organizations
dc.subject	IST research organizations
dc.subject	Implementation
dc.subject	Implementation
dc.subject	Implementation
dc.subject	Implementation
dc.subject	Implementation
dc.subject	Inclusion
dc.subject	Inclusion
dc.subject	Inclusion
dc.subject	Inequality
dc.subject	Inequality
dc.subject	Inequality
dc.subject	Information Sciences and Technology
dc.subject	Information Sciences and Technology
dc.subject	Information Sciences and Technology
dc.subject	Information Sciences and Technology
dc.subject	Information Sciences and Technology
dc.subject	Information Systems
dc.subject	Information Systems
dc.subject	Information Systems
dc.subject	Institutional change
dc.subject	Institutional change
dc.subject	Institutional change
dc.subject	Institutional communication
dc.subject	Institutional communication
dc.subject	Institutional communication
dc.subject	Interventions
dc.subject	Interventions
dc.subject	Interventions
dc.subject	Italy
dc.subject	Italy
dc.subject	Italy
dc.subject	Learn-by-doing approach
dc.subject	Learn-by-doing approach
dc.subject	Learn-by-doing approach
dc.subject	Participatory Gender Audit
dc.subject	Participatory Gender Audit
dc.subject	Participatory Gender Audit
dc.subject	Participatory approach
dc.subject	Participatory approach
dc.subject	Participatory approach
dc.subject	Participatory assessment and design
dc.subject	Participatory assessment and design
dc.subject	Participatory assessment and design
dc.subject	Physics
dc.subject	Physics
dc.subject	Physics
dc.subject	Planning
dc.subject	Planning
dc.subject	Planning
dc.subject	Quantitative and qualitative approach
dc.subject	Quantitative and qualitative approach
dc.subject	Quantitative and qualitative approach
dc.subject	Research
dc.subject	Research
dc.subject	Research
dc.subject	Research
dc.subject	Research
dc.subject	Research organisation
dc.subject	Research organisation
dc.subject	Research organisation
dc.subject	Research organizations
dc.subject	Research organizations
dc.subject	Research organizations
dc.subject	Resistances
dc.subject	Resistances
dc.subject	Resistances
dc.subject	STEM
dc.subject	STEM
dc.subject	STEM
dc.subject	STEM
dc.subject	STEM
dc.subject	Structural change
dc.subject	Structural change
dc.subject	Structural change
dc.subject	Structural change
dc.subject	Structural change
dc.subject	Structural changes
dc.subject	Structural changes
dc.subject	Structural changes
dc.subject	Structural changes
dc.subject	Structural changes
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Sustainability
dc.subject	Tools
dc.subject	Tools
dc.subject	Tools
dc.subject	University
dc.subject	University
dc.subject	University

Edited book
open access

Lesson Learned from the Field

edited by

Maria Sangiuliano Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia

Agostino Cortesi Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Gender balance in research organizations is considered as a key step for ensuring research excellence and quality and inclusive-sustainable innovation. Still, in spite of an increasing number of HE and research institutions committed to make science more equal and some positive trends in figures on Gender equality in STEM research, it still appears to be difficult to prioritize gender equality. This is particularly true for disciplines such as ICT/IST where female representation at all levels is among the lowest ones among STEM topics and where a gender sensitive approach to ICT design and programming is far from being understood in its implications among computer and information systems scientist. H2020 (PGERI and SWAFS programmes in particular), promoted the concept of institutional change for gender equality, insisting on the need for merging change management and gender policies. The volume is focusing on a presentation and reflexive review of results and tools from the H2020 EQUAL-IST project to discuss opportunities to innovate and transform HR management and Institutional communication, research design, teaching & students services, via gender equality, and how such innovations could be multiplied and sustained with a focus on ICT and IST research organizations. The volume is complemented by contributions from other projects on institutional change in research.

Published

Dec. 17, 2019

Language

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-335-9

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-334-2

Keywords

Participatory Gender Audit • Information Sciences and Technology • Interventions • Co-design • Gender equality in ICT/IST research institutions • Gender stereotypes • Gender equality • IST research organizations • Gender Gap • Participatory assessment and design • Quantitative and qualitative approach • Physics • Structural changes • Gender equality plans • Gender segregation • ICT Summer Camp • Equality • Engineering • Gender audits • Gender Equality Plan • Participatory approach • Gender Equality Plans (GEPS) • Institutional change • Research organisation • Research organizations • Gender equality in research • Control bodies • Gender Equality Plans • Research • Information Systems • Planning • Gender • Cohalition building • Context sensitive monitoring • Institutional communication • Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) • Inclusion • Academia • Learn-by-doing approach • Resistances • Sustainability • Boards of directors • Italy • Tools • University • STEM • Diversity • Implementation • Inequality • Structural change • Crowdsourcing

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-334-2

Copyright: © 2019 Maria Sangiuliano, Agostino Cortesi. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.