Assessing the Mixed or Generic Feminine as an Inclusive Language

« previous chapter | next chapter »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_4715
dc.contributor.author	Pires Mat
dc.title	Assessing the Mixed or Generic Feminine as an Inclusive Language Strategy
dc.type	Chapter
dc.language.iso	en
dc.description.abstract	Proposed grammatical gender-neutral language practices employing rephrasing, binomials, or abbreviated double forms are unlikely to achieve general acceptance or durably modify the linguistic system given their unusual graphical features, variable treatment of speech and writing, heavy processing requirements, increased volume, and overall complexity. In contrast, use of the feminine for mixed reference is well established for female-dominated professions such as nurse, draws on established linguistic resources, and preserves correspondance between written and spoken language. We provide examples of this strategy in several languages and discuss its advantages and shortcomings.
dc.relation.ispartof	Quaderni del Comitato Unico di Garanzia dell’Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.issued	2020-12-29
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-479-0/assessing-the-mixed-or-generic-feminine-as-an-incl/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/978-88-6969-478-3/006
dc.identifier.issn	2724-4652
dc.identifier.eissn	2724-5713
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-479-0
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-478-3
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Feminization
dc.subject	Feminization
dc.subject	Gender resolution
dc.subject	Gender resolution
dc.subject	Grammatical gender
dc.subject	Grammatical gender
dc.subject	Inclusive language
dc.subject	Inclusive language
dc.subject	Linguistic sexism
dc.subject	Linguistic sexism

Chapter
open access peer reviewed

Assessing the Mixed or Generic Feminine as an Inclusive Language Strategy

Mat Pires Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Proposed grammatical gender-neutral language practices employing rephrasing, binomials, or abbreviated double forms are unlikely to achieve general acceptance or durably modify the linguistic system given their unusual graphical features, variable treatment of speech and writing, heavy processing requirements, increased volume, and overall complexity. In contrast, use of the feminine for mixed reference is well established for female-dominated professions such as nurse, draws on established linguistic resources, and preserves correspondance between written and spoken language. We provide examples of this strategy in several languages and discuss its advantages and shortcomings.

Published

Dec. 29, 2020

Language

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-479-0

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-478-3

Keywords: Linguistic sexism • Grammatical gender • Feminization • Inclusive language • Gender resolution

permalink: http://doi.org/10.30687/978-88-6969-478-3/006

Copyright: © 2020 Mat Pires. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite