La decisione delle Sezioni Unite in materia di contratti derivati:…

« previous article | next article »

DC Field	Value
dc.identifier	ECF_article_7865
dc.title	La decisione delle Sezioni Unite in materia di contratti derivati: profili di criticità della sentenza n. 8770/2020
dc.contributor.author	Galasso Nicolò
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing, Fondazione Università Ca’ Foscari
dc.type	Research Article
dc.language.iso	it
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/ricerche-giuridiche/2020/2/la-decisione-delle-sezioni-unite-in-materia-di-con/
dc.description.abstract	The ruling of the Supreme Court declares a derivative contract null and void due to the lack of informative elements, such as the mark to market, the probabilistic scenarios and the hidden costs. The failure to indicate these elements determines the lack of a clear and defined causal profile of the contract. The Court arrives at this solution, focusing only on the principles of civil law, leaving aside, however, the specific rules contained in the TUF.
dc.relation.ispartof	Ricerche giuridiche
dc.relation.ispartof	Vol. 9 \| Issue 2 \| December 2020
dc.issued	2020-12-21
dc.dateAccepted	2021-12-29
dc.dateSubmitted	2021-11-30
dc.identifier.issn
dc.identifier.eissn	2281-6100
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.identifier.doi	10.30687/Rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006
dc.peer-review	yes
dc.subject	Autorizzazione
dc.subject	Causa (nozione, distinzioni)
dc.subject	Contratti derivati
dc.subject	Derivati conclusi da enti pubblici
dc.subject	Organo competente
dc.subject	Requisiti (elementi del contratto)

Research Article
open access peer reviewed

La decisione delle Sezioni Unite in materia di contratti derivati: profili di criticità della sentenza n. 8770/2020

Nicolò Galasso Dottorando di ricerca in Diritto, mercato e persona nell’Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

The ruling of the Supreme Court declares a derivative contract null and void due to the lack of informative elements, such as the mark to market, the probabilistic scenarios and the hidden costs. The failure to indicate these elements determines the lack of a clear and defined causal profile of the contract. The Court arrives at this solution, focusing only on the principles of civil law, leaving aside, however, the specific rules contained in the TUF.

Published

Dec. 21, 2020

Accepted

Dec. 29, 2021

Submitted

Nov. 30, 2021

Language

Keywords: Autorizzazione • Requisiti (elementi del contratto) • Organo competente • Contratti derivati • Derivati conclusi da enti pubblici • Causa (nozione, distinzioni)

permalink http://doi.org/10.30687/Rg/2281-6100/2022/01/006

Copyright: © 2020 Nicolò Galasso. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

References to this chapter

How to cite