La critica all’argomento del ‘consensus gentium’ in Christian Francken e

« capitolo precedente | capitolo successivo »

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Campo DC	Valore
dc.identifier	ECF_chapter_621
dc.contributor.author	Biagioni Mario
dc.title	La critica all’argomento del ‘consensus gentium’ in Christian Francken e François de La Mothe Le Vayer
dc.type	Capitolo
dc.language.iso	it
dc.description.abstract	Christian Francken criticized the argument ʻConsensus gentiumʼ for the first time in Breve Colloquium Iesuiticum (1579), claiming that the similarity between the Christian rituals and Eastern ones was due to the human origin of both. The need for an unquestionable criterion of truth drove him later to discover the ancient skepticism, and in Disputatio […] de incertitudine religionis Christianae (1593) Francken denied that ʻConsensus gentiumʼ could be an evidence for the existence of God. François de La Mothe Le Vayer in the Dialogues faits à l’imitation des anciens (1630-33) dealt with similar topics. He showed the inadequacy of dogmatism and the necessity of skepticism, faced with the endless variety of customs and religions in the world. This is only one example of ideas spreading from the theological debates of the Radical Reformation to the thought of Libertines, until the Enlightenment.
dc.relation.ispartof	Philosophica
dc.publisher	Edizioni Ca’ Foscari - Digital Publishing
dc.issued	2017-04-12
dc.dateSubmitted	2016-12-14
dc.identifier.uri	http://edizionicafoscari.it/it/edizioni4/libri/978-88-6969-133-1/la-critica-allargomento-del-consensus-gentium-in-c/
dc.identifier.doi	10.14277/6969-132-4/PHIL-3-2
dc.identifier.issn	2610-8933
dc.identifier.eissn	2610-8925
dc.identifier.isbn	978-88-6969-133-1
dc.identifier.eisbn	978-88-6969-132-4
dc.rights	Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
item.fulltext	with fulltext
item.grantfulltext	open
dc.peer-review	no
dc.subject	Consensus gentium
dc.subject	Consensus gentium
dc.subject	Francken
dc.subject	Francken
dc.subject	Libertinism
dc.subject	Libertinism
dc.subject	Radical Reformation
dc.subject	Radical Reformation
dc.subject	Skepticism
dc.subject	Skepticism

Capitolo
open access

La critica all’argomento del ‘consensus gentium’ in Christian Francken e François de La Mothe Le Vayer

Mario Biagioni Liceo Scientifico Statale «Amedeo di Savoia», Pistoia, Italia

VIEW PDF DOWNLOAD PDF

abstract

Christian Francken criticized the argument ʻConsensus gentiumʼ for the first time in Breve Colloquium Iesuiticum (1579), claiming that the similarity between the Christian rituals and Eastern ones was due to the human origin of both. The need for an unquestionable criterion of truth drove him later to discover the ancient skepticism, and in Disputatio […] de incertitudine religionis Christianae (1593) Francken denied that ʻConsensus gentiumʼ could be an evidence for the existence of God. François de La Mothe Le Vayer in the Dialogues faits à l’imitation des anciens (1630-33) dealt with similar topics. He showed the inadequacy of dogmatism and the necessity of skepticism, faced with the endless variety of customs and religions in the world. This is only one example of ideas spreading from the theological debates of the Radical Reformation to the thought of Libertines, until the Enlightenment.

Presentato

14 Dicembre 2016

Lingua

ISBN (PRINT)

978-88-6969-133-1

ISBN (EBOOK)

978-88-6969-132-4

Keywords: Consensus gentium • Francken • Skepticism • Libertinism • Radical Reformation

permalink: http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-132-4/PHIL-3-2

Copyright: © 2017 Mario Biagioni. This is an open-access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction is permitted, provided that the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. The license allows for commercial use. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

Citazioni verso questo capitolo

How to cite