Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017
a cura di
abstract
The title of the Series «Sapere l’Europa, sapere d’Europa» voices the desire to investigate facets of the process of European integration without disregarding its most weighty, however controversial and bureaucratic, aspects, yet looking beyond them. The main intent is thus to make room for vision, feelings, imagination. In this fourth volume, Cultural Heritage. Scenarios 2015-2017, the different profiles of the CH, tangible and intangible, are undoubtedly presented in an international and interdisciplinary perspective. Yet, as the constant reference to the Faro Convention proves, “practices, knowledge and collective traditions” – be they nested or not in the humus of Venice and the Veneto Region – still distinctively taste of Europe.
Faro Convention • Study circle • Guilt • Ownership • Venetian craftsmanship • Unesco • Cultural interest • Local communities • Social memory • Digital heritage • Biocultural paradigm • Folklore • Gondola’s heritagisation • Digital repatriation • Subject-object • Tourism • Scuola dalmata di San Giorgio e Trifone • Ethnography • Endangered heritage • Heritage • Cultural communities • Mexico • Working tools • Urban sprawl • Indigenous people • Sharing and integration • International law • Local CH • Digital culture • International art market • Terrorism • Stakeholders • Migrants’ rights • Italian Colonialism • Slovenia • Cultural • CH • Fascism • Chorus • Local collective action • Waterscapes • Digital • Social justice • Dalmatia • Representations • Stigmatization • Heritage Community • Certificate of free circulation • Common good • Exclusion • Heritage community • Life-long learning methods • Intangible • Animal Rights Movements • Participation • Cultural identity • Intangible Cultural Heritage • Religious heritage • Knowledge • Vernacular architecture • Venice • Politics of place • Access • Heritage politics • Management and governance • Europe • ICH • NGOs • Cultural sustainability • Right to take part in cultural life • Commons • Landscape • Ecomuseums • Restitution • Heritage walk • Human rights • Regional law • Memory • Communities • Humanitarian law • Participative approach • Responsibility to protect • Dance • Legal and Social Anthropology • Intentional destruction • Representation • Sephardic Jews • Guardians • Agreement • Cultural goods • Active Citizenship • Mediterranean • Museums • Appropriation • Bona fide purchaser • Dialogue • Cultural property • Gender • Cultural heritage • Property • Ruskin • Hydrography • Ecosystems research • Mining • Destruction • Right to participate in cultural life • Cultural properties • Traditional Knowledge • Adult education • Governance • Romani People • Heritage practices • Cultural rights • Street performances • Contemporary conflicts • Return • Right to the (I)CH • Tintoretto
permalink http://doi.org/10.14277/6969-052-5/SE-4